Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Building the Hybrid Cloud
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Future of Government Data Centers
- The Future of IT: How CIOs Can Enable the Service-Oriented Enterprise
- Government Perspectives on Mobility and the Cloud
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Mitigating Insider Threats in Virtual & Cloud Environments
- Modern Mission Critical Series
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- The New Generation of Database
- Reimagining the Next Generation of Government
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Targeting Advanced Threats: Proven Methods from Detection through Remediation
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- The Truth About IT Opex and Software Defined Networking
- Value of Health IT
- Air Traffic Management Transformation Report
- Cloud First Report
- General Dynamics IT Enterprise Center
- Gov Cloud Minute
- Government in Technology Series
- Homeland Security Cybersecurity Market Report
- National Cybersecurity Awareness Month
- Technology Insights
- The Cyber Security Report
- The Next Generation Cyber Security Experts
Shows & Panels
Does happiness trickle down?
Wednesday - 3/14/2012, 2:00am EDT
Although Don and I have never discussed the meaning of the sign, or why it is posted in such a prominent spot — eye-level above the bar — even the most dense male gets it. And knows it is a universal truth.
By the same token, if your boss isn't happy, odds are you will feel his or her pain. At least during working hours. Sometimes on weekends and holidays too. Sometimes for years.
Career members of the Senior Executive Service are in place when their political masters arrive and generally they outlast SES politicals and Schedule Cs. While the political appointees are there, however, they can do a lot of good. Or a lot of damage.
The primary firewall between career employees and ambitious, sometimes blindly partisan political appointees, is supposed to be the SES. Career people who know the rules, know how things work (by the book and off the books), and have often survived several different administrations.
Some members of Congress have criticized the career SES because many, if not most, of its members have only worked for one agency. In one assignment. They believe the SES was set up to ensure mobility, and to keep executives from going strong or becoming wedded to one agency, one program or one way of doing things.
Yesterday's column, "Shuffling The SES Deck", was about the pros and cons of mobility as a way of life. It prompted this response from one reader:
... Your article could easily be retitled "Kissing A-- To Get To The Top." Before retiring, I worked for nearly 20 years in D.C. for an agency with many SES. Some very good managers. However problems do happen when you inbreed too long. I saw a few average GS 15s get promoted to SES status because of many years of 'yes sir, right away sir, three bags full' instead of acting as a manager of a program and disagreeing with the head shed when their actions might be detrimental to that program.So how are things at the top of the career pyramid? We'll ask that question of Carol Bonosaro on today's Your Turn radio show. She's a former government executive who is now president of the Senior Executives Association.
Second, I never saw a poor SES removed. That would be admitting a mistake from the top.
I agree with the woman you cited in the article that many good managers avoided SES because the money wasn't worth the hassle All that said, I fully believe that SES should rotate among (similar) agencies to expand their capabilities. And maybe weed out the 'Peter Principle' SESers back to GS 15s when they fail. Oh I forgot they never fail.
Pay freeze, again?
So what's Congress next going to do to (as opposed to for) federal workers and retirees? We'll put that question to Capitol Hill-watchers Stephen Losey and Sean Reilly. Both are senior writers for the Federal Times. We'll also talk about buyouts, downsizing in the Postal Service and threats to the retirement system that could impact current employees.
NEARLY USELESS FACTOID
By Jack Moore
Las Vegas is known as Sin City, so you'd think almost anything goes. But according to Mental_Floss, the city banned Hula Hoops and megaphones in certain parts of the city.
MORE FROM FEDERAL NEWS RADIO
Senate to vote on pay freeze amendment
The amendment to extend the federal pay freeze through 2013 is part of the highway bill the Senate will vote on today. Another amendment would allow feds who are about to retire the opportunity to work part-time.
Pause of financial systems had little effect on cost
GAO reviewed the administration's implementation of the July 2010 memo calling for a governmentwide review of financial management projects. Auditors found about half of the projects said there was no change in cost and three-quarters said their schedule remained the same. The audit agency also said OMB approved 17 projects, partially approved six, shut down one and still is reviewing seven others.
Obama administration two-sided on openness, expert says
Every year in March, journalist groups focus on openness and transparency in government as part of "Sunshine Week." While the Project on Government Oversight is focused on those topics year-round, Sunshine Week is an opportunity for the group to remind people about the importance of openness in government.
Mike's Take: The sanctity of Facebook
Divorce is tough regardless of your age or the age you live in, but never more so than in the 21st Century ... when we became a Facebook Nation.