8:22 am, May 27, 2015

FederalNewsRadio.com - Purpose of Comments statement Click to show

Hubbard Radio, LLC encourages site users to express their opinions by posting comments. Our goal is to maintain a civil dialogue in which readers feel comfortable. At times, the comment boards following articles, blog posts and other content can descend to personal attacks. Please do not engage in such behavior here. We encourage your thoughtful comments which:

  • Have a positive and constructive tone
  • Are on topic, clear and to-the-point
  • Are respectful toward others and their opinions

Hubbard Radio, LLC reserves the right to remove comments which do not conform to these criteria.

  • 3

  • The range of a fighter depends upon its tanker
    A modern jet fighter consumes about 1/3 of its maximum fuel load just getting to With a full fuel load at altitude, a fighter can go farther and stay longer. The old propellor-driven tankers fly at a maximum speed that is dangerously close to the stall speed of a modern jet fighter. The old tankers have a large RADAR image and are vulnerable to attack from modern missiles. It does little good to have a new F35 in production without tankers that can fuel them safely.
    { "Agree":"1","Funny":"1","Insightful":"1","Disagree":"-1","Offensive":"-1","Troll":"-1" }
  • Oops! The first sentense is missing a word or two.
    It should read, "A modern jet fighter consumes about 1/3rd of its maximum fuel load just getting to altitude. With a full . . ." Sorry.
    { "Agree":"1","Funny":"1","Insightful":"1","Disagree":"-1","Offensive":"-1","Troll":"-1" }
  • Prop Tanker?
    KC-135'S have turbo fan's. Our C-130's refuel helicopters. I dont think anybody is using kc-97's to refuel fighters. And i dont think a 767 was designed with observability in mind.
    { "Agree":"1","Funny":"1","Insightful":"1","Disagree":"-1","Offensive":"-1","Troll":"-1" }
  • { "Agree":"1","Funny":"1","Insightful":"1","Disagree":"-1","Offensive":"-1","Troll":"-1" }