2:24 am, July 14, 2014

FederalNewsRadio.com - Purpose of Comments statement Click to show

Hubbard Radio, LLC encourages site users to express their opinions by posting comments. Our goal is to maintain a civil dialogue in which readers feel comfortable. At times, the comment boards following articles, blog posts and other content can descend to personal attacks. Please do not engage in such behavior here. We encourage your thoughtful comments which:

  • Have a positive and constructive tone
  • Are on topic, clear and to-the-point
  • Are respectful toward others and their opinions

Hubbard Radio, LLC reserves the right to remove comments which do not conform to these criteria.

  • 1
       

  • Set up to fail...
    bwhunan
    While I'm a proponent of effective planning and efficient use of resources, I'm perplexed by this bill at this point in time. Agency performance is directly attributable to personnel performance. How long does congress think Federal agencies can efficiently perform with a 2-year pay freeze? Regardless of what President Obama's performance officer says, Federal workers will leave service for better paying opportunities when available and the government will have a very hard time attracting talent. If better opportunities aren't available, performance will decrease on account of feeling trapped in a job lacking annual monetary increases in order to keep up with rising economic prices. An excerpt from the bill: Identify major management challenges that are Governmentwide or crosscutting in nature and describe plans to address such challenges, including relevant performance goals, performance indicators, and milestones. Hmm, how about congress expecting more while giving the producers less?
    { "Agree":"1","Funny":"1","Insightful":"1","Disagree":"-1","Offensive":"-1","Troll":"-1" }
  • { "Agree":"1","Funny":"1","Insightful":"1","Disagree":"-1","Offensive":"-1","Troll":"-1" }