2:43 pm, February 28, 2015

FederalNewsRadio.com - Purpose of Comments statement Click to show

Hubbard Radio, LLC encourages site users to express their opinions by posting comments. Our goal is to maintain a civil dialogue in which readers feel comfortable. At times, the comment boards following articles, blog posts and other content can descend to personal attacks. Please do not engage in such behavior here. We encourage your thoughtful comments which:

  • Have a positive and constructive tone
  • Are on topic, clear and to-the-point
  • Are respectful toward others and their opinions

Hubbard Radio, LLC reserves the right to remove comments which do not conform to these criteria.

  • 2
       

  • Seasonal TSP
    Ne01
    1. 20 years vs 85 years Ordinary I would agree that a longer time frame would optimize results but that is not in this case. The variables included in the 85 year time frame include the crash of 1929 which is ok but the market dynamics (from computers, individual traders, and derivatives(just to name a few)) have changed substantially and thus leave a 85 year analysis for seasonal adjustment in an disputable position; you decide. 2. Re: 600% turn over for seasonal adjustments. I personally do not subscribe to the seasonal adjustment and my percentage is defiantly higher but so is my ROI 23% YTD. I have my issues with L-funds and the market but for the last seven years I have managed to succeed, of course this includes 2008!
    { "Agree":"1","Funny":"1","Insightful":"1","Disagree":"-1","Offensive":"-1","Troll":"-1" }
  • { "Agree":"1","Funny":"1","Insightful":"1","Disagree":"-1","Offensive":"-1","Troll":"-1" }