Home > Pay & Benefits > Your Turn > Your Turn Archives
Your Turn with Mike Causey
Listen Wednesdays at 10:00 AM
Senior Correspondent Mike Causey takes your calls and emails live for an hour on FederalNewsRadio. Ask him about anything! From pay and benefits, to policy and politics. Send in your questions to YourTurn@FederalNewsRadio.com or call toll-free during the show: 1-877-936-9333

Sick Leave: Use It or Lose It

November 27, 2006 - 4:57am



Most of the people who work for Uncle Sam are under the Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS.) In some ways FERS is superior to the old retirement program (a better 401(k) deal and Social Security coverage,) and in some ways worse: Like a smaller civil service retirement benefit, diet cost of living adjustments which start at age 62, and being under a use-it-or-lose it sick leave system.

Under the old retirement plan (CSRS) workers can boost their retirement annuity by applying their unused sick leave toward their service time, but under FERS that leave, if unused, is lost to the employee.

Many people think that's fine. Sick leave is for when you are sick, period. Others think there should be some reward for being healthy (or an iron man or woman) or that the use-it-or-lose it system encourages abuse.

So why the difference between CSRS and FERS?

Years ago Uncle Sam discovered that a lot of people (then under CSRS) got sick, a lot, just before they retired. After a GAO study the conclusion what that folks were using rather than losing their leave.

That left Congress three choices:

  1. do like the private sector where leave accumulation is often limited,
  2. go after use-it-or-lose it folks or
  3. reward people to eliminate abuse.

It chose the latter.

Purists, who argue that sick leave is for the sick, lost that battle, but they won the next round when Congress created the FERS program to replace CSRS for new hires. It was careful not to make what many considered the same mistake twice. That is to reward employees who weren't sick for not taking sick leave.

So how has that worked out?

Consider this letter from a Florida fed, Robert C., who is planning to retire in a couple of years.

If I do not use any sick time before I retire, I will have accumulated about 6 months worth of sick leave. I think it's unfair that "not" being a sick leave abuser will cause me to lose all of this time without (getting) any credit. Is there any chance that the rules may change allowing FERS employees to get credit for this time like those in the CSRS plan can get?

The short answer is no way!!! Congress is not, and probably will never, seriously consider giving FERS employees retirement-time credit for unused sick leave. But it might go with a system that would give feds partial credit for unused sick leave.

So what do you think? Is this right? Is sick leave only for the sick, or is it more than that?

Click, vent, send: mcausey@federalnewsradio.com

Listen Now!
Read Mike Causey's Federal Report
Previous Your Turn Shows

Today's News

Home | About Us | Privacy Statement | Terms of Use | Copyright Infringement | EEO Public File Report | Bonneville International
AP material Copyright 2009 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.