Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Building the Hybrid Cloud
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Future of Government Data Centers
- The Future of IT: How CIOs Can Enable the Service-Oriented Enterprise
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Modern Mission Critical Series
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- The New Generation of Database
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Targeting Advanced Threats: Proven Methods from Detection through Remediation
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- The Truth About IT Opex and Software Defined Networking
- Value of Health IT
- Air Traffic Management Transformation Report
- Cloud First Report
- General Dynamics IT Enterprise Center
- Gov Cloud Minute
- Government in Technology Series
- Homeland Security Cybersecurity Market Report
- National Cybersecurity Awareness Month
- Technology Insights
- The Cyber Security Report
- The Next Generation Cyber Security Experts
Shows & Panels
Gaping holes in financial protections leave service members at high risk
Friday - 11/22/2013, 4:09am EST
State and federal consumer protection officials told Congress this week that more needs to be done to protect members of the military from predatory lenders and other shady businesses, including more consumer education and law enforcement.
A decade ago, researchers and military advocates began to document the fact that the communities around military bases across the country were suddenly saturated by payday lending stores. Concerned that the businesses were intentionally preying on military members, their steady paychecks and the general lack of financial acumen that accompanies the average 19-year-old, Congress passed the Military Lending Act in 2006. The law capped the annual percentage rate lenders could charge at 36 percent.
But Holly Petraeus, the director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's Office of Servicemember Affairs, said the law and the regulations the Defense Department wrote to implement it contain numerous loopholes. And shady lenders have found them.
"The spouse of a wounded warrior in the Illinois National Guard took out an auto title loan of $2,575 at an APR of 300 percent. The finance charges on the loan were over $5,000, and the loan was not subject to the MLA because it was longer than 181 days," she said. "Service members from North Carolina and Delaware each took out loans at 584 percent. The loans were not subject to the act's protections, because they were open-end lines of credit. At Joint Base McGuire- Dix-Lakehurst, N.J., a sailor had one loan at 499 percent and another at 197 percent, neither covered by the MLA. He was paying over 66 percent of his take- home pay on those two loans."
Some lenders have figured out an easy way around another key protection for military members: the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act. That law caps interest rates under some circumstances, protects them from eviction and grants numerous other protections.
Dwain Alexander, the senior attorney for the Navy's mid-Atlantic region legal service office, said unscrupulous used car dealers near military bases routinely insert clauses in their financing contracts in which the military member agrees to waive the SCRA protections. Then, the lender can easily get a default judgment in court if a borrower misses a payment. The contracts also tend to require that if the service member wants to dispute some aspect of the deal, it has to be handled through private arbitration, not in court.
Alexander said those dealers set up shop as close as possible to military bases and see servicemen and women as easy targets for deals that aren't in their best financial interest.
"They're all young, generally junior in rank, most only have a high school education," he said. "For them, their pay is guaranteed. It's recession-proof. So when the recession hit and cars couldn't be sold, my guys could buy cars. When they go into a business, people know how much they make just by asking a few questions, because their pay is public knowledge. And their pay is easy to garnish."
Consumer advocates say the targeting is not limited to used cars and short-term loans. A Senate Commerce Committee hearing Wednesday focused in particular on one company that already has paid multimillion dollar consumer fraud settlements in two states, under different names, and still is operating.
In Tennessee, the company was called Britlee. It operated an extremely lucrative mall kiosk that sold computers, video game consoles and other consumer electronics just outside Fort Campbell, which straddles the Kentucky-Tennessee border.
It attracted soldiers from the nearby base by advertising special deals for military members, said Robert Cooper, the Tennessee Attorney General.
"They falsely claimed that that they were offering zero percent financing. This was called, at different times, 'free financing,' '100 percent military financing,' or 'special programs for service members,' but it was really a 19.2 percent APR, not counting other hidden fees and contract terms that were in the arrangement," Cooper said. "And then they engaged in abusive collection practices, including contacting superior officers." Also, the company allegedly marked up the prices of the electronics it sold soldiers by more than 300 percent. But the service members who bought those items never saw the retail price they were actually paying. Instead, Cooper said, Britlee marketed its goods based on the cost of regular, recurring payments, and insisted that service members pay via automatic allotments from their paychecks.
"They had soldiers making the purchase go online on the spot, access their military pay accounts and set up bank accounts in Kentucky," he said. "Predictably, these payments were very difficult to stop, even after the court enjoined further collections."