Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Building the Hybrid Cloud
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Future of Government Data Centers
- The Future of IT: How CIOs Can Enable the Service-Oriented Enterprise
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Modern Mission Critical Series
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- The New Generation of Database
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Targeting Advanced Threats: Proven Methods from Detection through Remediation
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- The Truth About IT Opex and Software Defined Networking
- Value of Health IT
- Air Traffic Management Transformation Report
- Cloud First Report
- General Dynamics IT Enterprise Center
- Gov Cloud Minute
- Government in Technology Series
- Homeland Security Cybersecurity Market Report
- National Cybersecurity Awareness Month
- Technology Insights
- The Cyber Security Report
- The Next Generation Cyber Security Experts
Shows & Panels
USGS: Study of Japan earthquake helps predict future risks
Wednesday - 3/16/2011, 2:49pm EDT
To put the change in perspective, a 9.0 magnitude earthquake is 30 times bigger than a 8.0 magnitude earthquake, said Gavin Hayes, a geophysicist at USGS, in an interview with the DorobekINSIDER.
Independent from the USGS change, Japanese seismologists also updated their estimates of the earthquake's magnitude to 9.0.
Hayes said in large earthquakes like the one in Japan, the time it takes for energy to "propagate and stabilize" can be longer, which means it takes longer for seismologists to estimate the magnitude.
The academic community will continue to study the earthquake, particularly what part of the underwater fault moved, Hayes said. This analysis can help predict where the next earthquake might be, he added.
"For instance, we wouldn't expect a magnitude 9.0 earthquake on this same part of the fault, but adjacent parts of the fault that didn't move in this earthquake are probably at higher risk for moving in future earthquakes," Hayes said.