Shows & Panels
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- The Big Data Dilemma
- Carrying On with Continuity of Operations
- Connected Government
- Constituent Servicing
- Continuous Monitoring: Tools and Techniques for Trustworthy Government IT
- The Cyber Imperative
- Cyber Solutions for 2013 and Beyond
- The Data Privacy Imperative: Safeguarding Sensitive Data
- Expert Voices
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal IT Challenge
- Federal Tech Talk
- Mission-critical Apps in the Cloud
- The Modern Federal Threat Landscape
- The Path from Legacy Systems
- The Real Deal on Digital Government
- The Reality of Continuous Monitoring... Is Your Agency Secure?
- Veterans in Private Sector: Making the Transition
Shows & Panels
Gov lessons from Facebook's 'like' tag
Tuesday - 3/8/2011, 5:29pm EST
Such a rating system could help government agencies evaluate everything from their service to the public to vendor performance, said Steve Kelman, professor of public management at the Harvard Kennedy School of Government and former administrator of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy.
"The key is you gotta make it simpler or people won't do it," Kelman said in an interview with the DorobekINSIDER.
A disincentive now for agencies to obtain past performance on contractors are the "complex, bureaucratic forms," Kelman said.
However, if government agencies can simply click a thumbs up or down or rate a vendor on a scale of one to five, government customers get an instant snapshot of past performance, he said.
Another way to evaluate vendors is to include a rating system at the end of vouchers sent electronically. Agencies can rate how the vendor has performed that week, providing trend data that helps not only government customers but the contractors as well.
"If I were a contractor, I'd want this as an early warning signal," Kelman said.
Read Kelman's blog post in Federal Computer Week.