Shows & Panels
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- The Big Data Dilemma
- Carrying On with Continuity of Operations
- Connected Government
- Constituent Servicing
- Continuous Monitoring: Tools and Techniques for Trustworthy Government IT
- The Cyber Imperative
- Cyber Solutions for 2013 and Beyond
- Expert Voices
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal IT Challenge
- Federal Tech Talk
- Mission-critical Apps in the Cloud
- The Path from Legacy Systems
- The Real Deal on Digital Government
- The Reality of Continuous Monitoring... Is Your Agency Secure?
- Veterans in Private Sector: Making the Transition
Shows & Panels
Analysis: How will a government reorganization work?
Wednesday - 1/26/2011, 4:55pm EST
How the government restructures will first depend on first determining agencies' performance goals. The actual structural change is the last question, said Donald Kettl, dean of the School of Public Policy at the University of Maryland, in an interview with the DorobekINSIDER.
If the restructure is simply to change a political symbol, then the initiative could end up costing more money, Kettl said.
"It sounds good but doesn't actually save very much cash," he said.
Restructuring also could face pushback because it challenges already-drawn lines of authority, he added.
"On the Hill, jurisdictions convey power and with the power comes the ability to shape policy the way that you want it. When you start messing around with their lines, you're talking about taking power away from committee chairs and subcommittee chairs . Then you're picking very serious battles," Kettl said.
President Obama indicated in his Tuesday's State of the Union address that he would propose a five-year freeze on domestic spending.
Federal News Radio senior correspondent Mike Causey said five years is a "lifetime" in politics.
"You may mandate a program for five years, but the next Congress may very well change it," Causey said.
Take the DorobekINSIDER poll - What's the state of the federal government?