Shows & Panels
Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- American Readiness: Renewable Power and Efficiency Technologies
- Ask the CIO
- Building the Hybrid Cloud
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal News Radio's National Cyber Security Awareness Month Special Panel Discussion
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Future of Government Data Centers
- The Future of IT: How CIOs Can Enable the Service-Oriented Enterprise
- Government Perspectives on Mobility and the Cloud
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Mitigating Insider Threats in Virtual & Cloud Environments
- Modern Mission Critical Series
- The New Generation of Database
- Reimagining the Next Generation of Government
- Targeting Advanced Threats: Proven Methods from Detection through Remediation
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- The Truth About IT Opex and Software Defined Networking
- Air Traffic Management Transformation Report
- Cloud First Report
- General Dynamics IT Enterprise Center
- Gov Cloud Minute
- Government in Technology Series
- Homeland Security Cybersecurity Market Report
- National Cybersecurity Awareness Month
- Technology Insights
- The Cyber Security Report
- The Next Generation Cyber Security Experts
Shows & Panels
Rep. Connolly: Pay freeze unfair to feds
Tuesday - 11/30/2010, 5:15pm EST
"Why would you ... just pick out one item and not the most effective in terms of reducing the deficit?" Connolly said in an interview with the DorobekINSIDER.
In the face of a $14 trillion deficit, the two-year freeze would save $2 billion.
Despite his belief that the proposal was "not a thoughtful approach" to reducing the deficit, Connolly said he thinks the freeze will pass Congress.
"Given the tectonic shift that took place in the Nov. 2 election, I would say the climate of receptivity and sympathy for the federal workforce is significantly diminished," Connolly said.
The proposal for a freeze sends a negative message -- perhaps inadvertently -- about the federal workforce, feeding into the "demagogic rhetoric" in some midterm races, he said.
If federal workers continue to be a target for cost-cutting, Connolly said he is worried about the future of recruiting and retaining the federal workforce of the future.
Connolly said he believes feds understand that some sacrifices are due in this economy. However, "across the board" decisions and a "consequences be damned" attitude ultimately won't serve the public, he said.
"I don't think for a minute that the federal workforce sees itself as exempt from some sacrifice to address the federal deficit. We all have a part to play," Connolly said. "But neither do I think they think they should be unfairly singled out as the symbol of federal spending and the symbol of federal deficit reduction."
RELATED STORIES: Q&A about the federal pay freeze