Shows & Panels
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- The Big Data Dilemma
- Carrying On with Continuity of Operations
- Connected Government
- Constituent Servicing
- Continuous Monitoring: Tools and Techniques for Trustworthy Government IT
- The Cyber Imperative
- Cyber Solutions for 2013 and Beyond
- Expert Voices
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal IT Challenge
- Federal Tech Talk
- Mission-critical Apps in the Cloud
- The Path from Legacy Systems
- The Real Deal on Digital Government
- The Reality of Continuous Monitoring... Is Your Agency Secure?
- Veterans in Private Sector: Making the Transition
Shows & Panels
DorobekInsider: Transparency and stimulus - this stuff simply isn’t easy, but it could be powerful
Thursday - 4/16/2009, 2:04am EDT
I had the opportunity to attend a fascinating session Wednesday focusing on transparency and, specifically, the stimulus package — creatively titled “Transparency as a Management Tool.” The session was hosted by the CGI Initiative for Collaborative Government and George Mason University… and featured some of the best and the brightest:
* Kshemendra Paul, Federal Chief Architect at OMB’s Office of E-Government and IT, who is actively involved in establishing a central governmentwide system for Recovery Act reporting.
* David McClure, Managing Vice President at Gartner Government Research, who has consulted with numerous federal, state, and local government executives about the Recovery Act.
* Stan Czerwinski, Director of Strategic Issues at the General Accountability Office, who coordinates GAO’s work on stimulus programs.
* Lisa Schlosser, Director of the Office of Information Collection at the Environmental Protection Agency, who heads up EPA’s collection of environmental data submissions from state and local governments.
Just a few resource before I offer up some of what I took away from the conversation…
* On Federal News Radio 1500 AM’s Daily Debrief with Chris Dorobek and Amy Morris, we managed to get Andrew McLauchlin, director of the CGI initiative, who gave us his insights on the session. Hear that conversation here.
* Federal News Radio’s Jason Miller was also at the session. You can read his full story — and hear it — here. And Amy and I spoke to him about what he learned from the session. Hear that conversation here … particularly how the EPA is dealing with the approximately $7 billion in recovery act funding that it has to award — and track. The money quote from Miller’s story:
“The Recovery Act will illustrate some long standing problems with federal management,” says Paul Posner, a professor and the director of the Master’s in Public Administration program at George Mason University in Fairfax, Va.
“The information systems needed to carry out the transparency goal and help agencies work collaboratively will come under a lot of strain.”
* Federal Times reporter Gregg Carlstrom was also there and posted this story … And his lead actually captures the session nicely. “The $787 billion stimulus package requires unprecedented levels of transparency — and some federal managers and auditors are worried those requirements will place unfair scrutiny on their agencies,” Carlstrom writes.
* One of the documents that was discussed during the session was OMB’s recent guidance on the recovery spending and transparency . You can read the OMB guidance for yourself here.
* And, in full transparency, I posted my notes that I was taking during the session. Read them for yourself, if you dare. But remember — they are notes, so… not everything is spelled correctly or even coherent. But… you’re welcome to them.
Some of my take aways from what was a really excellent and insightful session.
* This is hard… It is important to remember that this has never been done before. This has never really been done before period, but this has really never been done before with this speed and at this scale and with this amount of focus. In fact, I would argue that there are few private sector organizations that could post near real time financial data. And it would be difficult enough if this was only federal agencies. That would be a Herculean task itself, but layer on the state, local and tribal organizations, grantees, and others… this is a monumental challenge.
* Transparency is additive… There was some conversation, as highlighted by Federal Times, that making raw data public could allow people to take data out of context. Trust is implicit intransparency . And most people are smart — at least most people who are going to dig through this kind of data. I think it would be very powerful for agencies to acknowledge that they don’t have all the answers — and acknowledge that they do, in fact, make mistakes. Data can be taken out of context, but it will be anyway. The best way to deal with that is to make data available in standard forms — seeDC’s Apps for Democracy — and, to quote Craig Newmark of Craig’s List fame — free the nerds.