Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Connected Government
- Consolidating Mission-critical Systems
- Constituent Servicing
- Continuous Monitoring: Tools and Techniques for Trustworthy Government IT
- The Data Privacy Imperative: Safeguarding Sensitive Data
- Eliminating the Pitfalls: Steps to Virtualization in Government
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- Government Cloud Brokerage: Who, What, When, Where, Why?
- Government Mobility
- Mission-critical Apps in the Cloud
- Mobile Device Management
- The Modern Federal Threat Landscape
- The Path from Legacy Systems
- Understanding the Intersection of Customer Service and Security in the Cloud
Shows & Panels
Monday - Friday, 4-7 p.m.
In Depth with Francis Rose features daily interviews with top government executives and contractors. Listen live from 4 to 7 p.m. or download his archived interviews below.
GOP lawmakers urge Obama to drop cyber executive order
Thursday - 10/11/2012, 6:39pm EDT
Doing so could be used as justification by other countries, such as China and Russia, to exert more control over the "non-regulatory, multistakeholder governance model that has allowed the Internet to flourish," wrote Fred Upton (R-Mich.), the chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, along with 10 other lawmakers from both chambers of Congress.
According to draft documents, the cyber order directs the Homeland Security Department to take the lead in setting up a framework to effectively share cyber threat information as well as identifying those private-sector entities deemed critical infrastructure, such as power and water companies.
Letter decries 'top-down' approach
The letter called into question the department's ability to oversee such a project. The lawmakers mentioned a recent Senate subcommittee report that criticized the department's handling of special fusion centers used to track terrorism threat information.
"What our nation and the companies that make up our cyber frontline need, above all else, is flexibility," the letter stated. "At best, creating a top-down, one-size fits all bureaucracy to address cybersecurity will slow our response and impose unnecessary costs on our economy."
The White House indicated last month it was working on an order, following months of debate on cybersecurity legislation in Congress — but no completed bills.
Legislation remains stalled
The House approved by a wide margin the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA) in April. However, the White House threatened to veto it over privacy concerns, and it has barely any traction in the Senate.
Meanwhile, action on a comprehensive Senate bill fizzled over the summer when the bill failed to garner enough support to move forward on a vote.
Two of the sponsors of that bill are divided over the President's intention to issue an executive order.
Sen. Joseph Lieberman (I-Conn.), chairman of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, has urged the President to act on the order.
Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), the committee's ranking member, has said the order shouldn't be a substitute for legislation and that, in fact, it could "send the unintended signal that congressional action is not urgently needed."