Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Connected Government
- Consolidating Mission-critical Systems
- Constituent Servicing
- The Data Privacy Imperative: Safeguarding Sensitive Data
- Eliminating the Pitfalls: Steps to Virtualization in Government
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- Government Cloud Brokerage: Who, What, When, Where, Why?
- Government Mobility
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Mobile Device Management
- The Modern Federal Threat Landscape
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- Understanding the Intersection of Customer Service and Security in the Cloud
Shows & Panels
Monday - Friday, 4-7 p.m.
In Depth with Francis Rose features daily interviews with top government executives and contractors. Listen live from 4 to 7 p.m. or download his archived interviews below.
Jury in NJ convicts Ill. man in military info case
Wednesday - 9/26/2012, 5:56pm EDT
NEWARK, N.J. (AP) - A former employee of a New Jersey-based defense contractor was found guilty Wednesday of taking U.S. military technology trade secrets from his employer and exporting them to his native China.
Sixing Liu, also known as Steve Liu, worked for Space & Navigation, a New Jersey division of New York-based L3 Communications. Liu, who had lived until recently in Flanders, N.J., was arrested at his home in Deerfield, Ill., in March 2011 and accused of taking restricted military data and presenting them at two conferences in China the previous fall. Prosecutors argued the technology was proprietary and could be used for target locators and other military applications.
A federal jury in Newark found Liu guilty on nine counts, including exporting defense-related data without a license, possessing stolen trade secrets and lying to federal agents. He was acquitted on two counts of lying to federal authorities about one of his visits to China.
"We will not tolerate the exploitation of this country's opportunities through the theft of our secrets," said New Jersey's U.S. Attorney, Paul Fishman.
Liu, 49, was ordered held until his Jan 7 sentencing. He faces more than 20 years in prison and possible deportation.
Liu sat quietly at the defense table and showed little reaction as the verdict was read. The father of three later turned to one of his daughters and handed her his watch and the contents of his pockets as he prepared to be led off to jail.
Liu's attorney, James Tunick, said they would file an appeal.
According to the indictment, Liu took a personal laptop computer to conferences on nanotechnology in Chongqing in 2009 and Shanghai in 2010 and, while there, gave presentations that described the technology he was working on, in violation of U.S. laws that prohibit exporting defense materials without a license or approval from the Department of State.
Returning from Shanghai in November 2010, Liu lied about his involvement in the conference when questioned by customs officials at Newark Liberty International Airport, prosecutors said.
"The United States spends billions of dollars each year on research and development, and this `intellectual capital' is very attractive to others," said Michael Ward, the head of the FBI in New Jersey. "If (the Chinese) are able to acquire this research, they can save billions and quickly develop their own products to compete against the United States, be it in the world economic market or on the battlefield."
Tunick had argued his client had not intentionally violated any rules and had downloaded information on his personal laptop to work on outside the office. Tunick also said Liu had received only brief training on the company's restrictions on sharing proprietary information and was unfamiliar with U.S. import-export rules. He also sought to downplay the conferences in China as academic gatherings that featured professors from many countries, including the U.S.
Describing his client as "an educator," Tunick said Liu's punishment seemed harshly disproportionate to those levied against U.S. corporations found guilty of violating the same trade laws.
"There was no financial motive, no quid pro quo," Tunick said of Liu's case. "On these types of alleged crimes, the Department of Justice treats corporations differently."
(Copyright 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)