Shows & Panels
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- The Big Data Dilemma
- Carrying On with Continuity of Operations
- Connected Government
- Constituent Servicing
- Continuous Monitoring: Tools and Techniques for Trustworthy Government IT
- The Cyber Imperative
- Cyber Solutions for 2013 and Beyond
- The Data Privacy Imperative: Safeguarding Sensitive Data
- Expert Voices
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal IT Challenge
- Federal Tech Talk
- Mission-critical Apps in the Cloud
- The Modern Federal Threat Landscape
- The Path from Legacy Systems
- The Real Deal on Digital Government
- The Reality of Continuous Monitoring... Is Your Agency Secure?
- Veterans in Private Sector: Making the Transition
Shows & Panels
Monday - Friday, 4-7 p.m.
In Depth with Francis Rose features daily interviews with top government executives and contractors. Listen live from 4 to 7 p.m. or download his archived interviews on our daily show blogs.
Despite Mythbusters, poor communication still plagues industry-government relationship
Thursday - 9/20/2012, 3:57am EDT
Over the last decade, the communication between contractors and agencies revolved around industry days, requests-for-information and a host of steps to ensure fairness.
What got lost in the concern over making sure everyone receives the same information is the importance of real discussions about how to solve agency problems. Then-OFPP Administrator Dan Gordon recognized this long-standing challenge, writing in the first Mythbusters memo that "…agencies often do not take full advantage of these existing flexibilities. Some agency officials may be reluctant to engage in these exchanges out of fear of protests or fear of binding the agency in an unauthorized manner."
|Why the industry/government
relationship was rated ineffective
Reason #1: OMB issues two Mythbusters memos to encourage easier acquisition process
Reason #2: DHS crafts draft vendor guidance ignoring spirit of Mythbusters
Reason #3: Industry skeptical of Mythbusters
(More primary source material available on The Obama Impact Resource Page)
In May 2012, OFPP issued Mythbusters 2 to dispel eight more misconceptions.
But the guidance has had only limited success. Federal News Radio has rated the administration's efforts to improve communication between government and industry ineffective.
The rating is part of Federal News Radio's special report, The Obama Impact: Evaluating the Last Four Years. Throughout the series, Federal News Radio examines 23 different ideas and initiatives instituted by the Obama Administration and ranks them as effective, ineffective and more progress needed.
The best example of the lack of progress is a Homeland Security Department draft vendor guidance from the National Protection and Programs Directorate. While NPPD never issued the vendor-communications checklist, it showed a lack of penetration of the Mythbusters memo.
IBM Federal General Manager Todd Ramsey told Federal News Radio in June a lack of communication too often is the biggest problem between vendors and agencies. He said the Mythbusters campaign is not as effective as intended.
Steven Grundman, the Lund Fellow for emerging defense challenges at the Atlantic Council, says the complexity of federal procurement is at the root of the contentious relationship between the Pentagon and contractors.
He agrees with the principles of Better Buying Power but the implementation lacks what Grundman called "a transmission belt that takes these big ideas and promulgates them into this great big bureaucracy called the acquisition workforce in a way that can really be enacted faithfully rather than hand-fistedly, which I fear is a lot of what contractors have experienced from Better Buying Power over the last couple of years."
The key to improving industry-DoD relationships is to agree to the right type of contract at the beginning of a project, which is one of the principles of Better Buying Power, he said.
"Lets get that right the first time so that we don't end up in these conflicts down the line," he said.
More from the special report, The Obama Impact: Evaluating the Last Four Years