Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Connected Government
- Consolidating Mission-critical Systems
- Constituent Servicing
- The Data Privacy Imperative: Safeguarding Sensitive Data
- Eliminating the Pitfalls: Steps to Virtualization in Government
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- Government Cloud Brokerage: Who, What, When, Where, Why?
- Government Mobility
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Mobile Device Management
- The Modern Federal Threat Landscape
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- Understanding the Intersection of Customer Service and Security in the Cloud
Shows & Panels
Monday - Friday, 4-7 p.m.
In Depth with Francis Rose features daily interviews with top government executives and contractors. Listen live from 4 to 7 p.m. or download his archived interviews below.
In Depth interviews - August 14
Tuesday - 8/14/2012, 3:17pm EDT
Don Kettl — Dean, School of Public Policy, University of Maryland
The number of federal jobs that require Senate confirmation has swelled significantly over the last few decades. During the Kennedy Administration, 850 political appointees had to be confirmed by the Senate. By the time President Obama took office, the number grew to 1,215.
In a rare recent show of bipartisanship, lawmakers decided before leaving for the August recess to reduce the Senate's confirmation workload. The President signed a bill Friday removes the confirmation requirement for 170 executive branch jobs and 3,000 military officer positions. Don Kettl has studied and written extensively about governance and government organization. He explains why the change is needed and why the Congress should cut even more confirmations.
Read the law that eliminates hundreds of confirmations here.
Tom Shoop — Editor in Chief, Government Executive
Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney has been pushing his business credentials on the campaign trail and ignoring his public service. But the attention lately has been centered around his pick for a running mate who wants to slash federal employees' pay so they mirror private sector pay and even the size of the workforce. GovExec's Tom Shoop tells In Depth that Romney and his vice presidential pick Paul Ryan may have a tough time running "Government Incorporated."
Read Shoop's most recent column: Romney, Vegas, Business and Government (GovExec)
Romney's VP pick targeted fed pay, benefits (Related Story)
Catherine Lotrionte — Institute for Law, Science and Global Security Director, Georgetown University
The United States has some decisions to make if there's a cyber attack on our nation's critical infrastructure. If a group of rogue cyber terrorists in another country shuts down the electrical grid, do we have legal authority to enter the country and stop them? Catherine Lotrionte breaks down the legal quagmire U.S. officials face including deciphering the difference between a disruptive or a destructive attack. Should the military or law enforcement respond?
Obama may act to stop infrastructure cyberattacks (Related Story)
Christopher Flavelle — Policy Analyst and Reporter, Bloomberg Government
Flavelle explains what a Romney-Ryan White House might mean for the federal budget beyond Medicare. Ryan has proposed freezing non-defense discretionary spending, which spread over 10 years would amount to significant cuts to education and the Federal Aviation Administration.
Read Flavelle's full analysis: Evolution of Ryan Budgets Steers Fiscal Complexity: BGOV Insight (Subscription Required)
DoD, State cooperation vital, official says (Related Story)
Also on the show: