Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Connected Government
- Consolidating Mission-critical Systems
- Constituent Servicing
- The Data Privacy Imperative: Safeguarding Sensitive Data
- Eliminating the Pitfalls: Steps to Virtualization in Government
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- Government Cloud Brokerage: Who, What, When, Where, Why?
- Government Mobility
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Mobile Device Management
- The Modern Federal Threat Landscape
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- Understanding the Intersection of Customer Service and Security in the Cloud
Shows & Panels
Monday - Friday, 4-7 p.m.
In Depth with Francis Rose features daily interviews with top government executives and contractors. Listen live from 4 to 7 p.m. or download his archived interviews below.
Law enforcement benefits vs. the rest of FERS
Friday - 7/8/2011, 6:06pm EDT
Federal News Radio
FERS benefits for federal law enforcement employees have some big differences compared with FERS benefits for other federal employees.
First, law enforcement benefits are more generous, said Tammy Flanagan, senior benefits director for National Institute of Transition Planning.
The law enforcement formula is based on 1.7 percent of their high-three salary and then multiplied by 20 years of service. That's compared with the 1 percent of the high-three used in calculating FERS annuity. Based on a calculation of 20 years of service, a law enforcement retiree is getting 34 percent of their high-three compared with a FERS employee getting 20 percent of their high-three.
Law enforcement is "getting right off the bat a 14 percent benefit in basic pension benefit," Flanagan said.
Another difference - Law enforcement is one of the few areas in the federal government that have mandatory retirement, in this case, at age 57, Flanagan said.
In exchange, federal law enforcement officers can retire earlier - at age 50 if they are within a "covered position" as defined in provision 6(c) in Title 5, or, they can retire at any age if they have 25 years of service.
"So they can go out at a relatively young age and start a second career, which many of them do," Flanagan said.
Younger retirees must be beware of withdrawing funds from their Thrift Savings Plan too early. There is a 10 percent tax penalty if you withdraw before age 59 1/2.
"You can be exempt from that if you separate or leave the government when you turn 55," Flanagan said, but added, "Some of these law enforcement officers will retire as soon as 47 or 48 so they're not exempt (immediately)."
"I always tell people that if you are going to start a second career and you're going to have enough income to cover your expenses, there's nothing wrong to leave the TSP in the Thrfit or move it to an IRA and touch it later when you fully retire, which for many of those might not be until 59 1/2 anyway," Flanagan said.
Federal v. State
Flanagan said she has heard from federal law enforcement who came from state positions that they would have received more lucrative benefits if they stayed at the state level.
However, Flanagan points out that some states are having trouble funding those pensions. Federal pensions might be moe secure, she said.
"But a lot of people might challenge me on that with all the proposals we're hearing this year," Flanagan said.
What Congress Gets by Tammy Flanagan (Government Executive)