Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Building the Hybrid Cloud
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Future of Government Data Centers
- The Future of IT: How CIOs Can Enable the Service-Oriented Enterprise
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- The New Generation of Database
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Targeting Advanced Threats: Proven Methods from Detection through Remediation
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- The Truth About IT Opex and Software Defined Networking
- Value of Health IT
- Air Traffic Management Transformation Report
- Cloud First Report
- General Dynamics IT Enterprise Center
- Gov Cloud Minute
- Government in Technology Series
- Homeland Security Cybersecurity Market Report
- National Cybersecurity Awareness Month
- Technology Insights
- The Cyber Security Report
- The Next Generation Cyber Security Experts
Shows & Panels
Monday - Friday, 4-7 p.m.
In Depth with Francis Rose features daily interviews with top government executives and contractors. Listen live from 4 to 7 p.m. or download his archived interviews below.
Insourcing vs. outsourcing in the defense sector
Tuesday - 5/17/2011, 6:40pm EDT
There are two kinds of related issues at play, according to David Berteau, director of the Defense-Industrial Initiatives Group at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. The first is which costs more - insourcing a contractor or outsourcing the work? The other is more basic.
"The government should know what persons cost at the time they make decisions to add or move them around," Berteau said. "There really needs to be sort of 'truth in budgeting.'"
Agencies need to have a methodology for figuring out those costs. In an assessment of the DoD's workforce costs, CSIS found that the Pentagon's methodology was "reasonably" good in analyzing direct costs but was short in analyzing the larger costs to the federal government. That is, it was able to analyze simple costs that it is directly responsible for, such as salary, but larger costs such as retirement, benefits and overhead costs were not as articulated in the methodology.
The fear is, Berteau said, that the Defense Department might be making decisions based on short-sighted and incomplete views of what the costs are of insourcing staff.
"You can train people more rapidly but you can't accumulate experience except by spending a year doing a year's worth of work," Berteau said. "You can't squeeze nine months by working nine times as hard into one month."
This story is part of Federal News Radio's daily DoD Report. For more defense news, click here.