Shows & Panels
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- The Big Data Dilemma
- Carrying On with Continuity of Operations
- Connected Government
- Constituent Servicing
- Continuous Monitoring: Tools and Techniques for Trustworthy Government IT
- The Cyber Imperative
- Cyber Solutions for 2013 and Beyond
- The Data Privacy Imperative: Safeguarding Sensitive Data
- Expert Voices
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal IT Challenge
- Federal Tech Talk
- Mission-critical Apps in the Cloud
- The Modern Federal Threat Landscape
- The Path from Legacy Systems
- The Real Deal on Digital Government
- The Reality of Continuous Monitoring... Is Your Agency Secure?
- Veterans in Private Sector: Making the Transition
Shows & Panels
Monday - Friday, 4-7 p.m.
In Depth with Francis Rose features daily interviews with top government executives and contractors. Listen live from 4 to 7 p.m. or download his archived interviews on our daily show blogs.
Breaking up big IT projects for better results - works!
Thursday - 9/9/2010, 8:30pm EDT
And both government agencies and vendors are buying into the concept. "I think it's the right thing to do," Paul Strasser, Senior Vice President of Strategic Development at Dynamics Research Corporation told me on Industry Chatter this afternoon. "It became very obvious during the administration change, during transition. The thought was these large projects are sometimes just too cumbersome, too hard to manage. They also run into potential budget issues as appropriations change on the Hill. They wanted to break these things into smaller pieces to make them more manageable."
And Paul confirmed that goal - making them more manageable - is working. "When you break them into smaller pieces, and you look at it, it fits with the mode in which we're developing systems today, which is around agile development, iterative development, and spiral development. So it all fits together in a very nice fashion to get the results you need to drive towards."
Paul explained what those three kinds of development are, and how they're different. Paul and I also talked about his three tenants of cyber security - people, process, and technology - and how those three elements impact each other, and your agency's effort to keep its network secure. We also dug into the reasons behind the challenges agencies have defining requirements in contracts. You can hear the whole conversation by clicking the audio link.