Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Connected Government
- Consolidating Mission-critical Systems
- Constituent Servicing
- The Data Privacy Imperative: Safeguarding Sensitive Data
- Eliminating the Pitfalls: Steps to Virtualization in Government
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- Government Cloud Brokerage: Who, What, When, Where, Why?
- Government Mobility
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Mobile Device Management
- The Modern Federal Threat Landscape
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- Understanding the Intersection of Customer Service and Security in the Cloud
Shows & Panels
Monday - Friday, 6-9 a.m.
Hosts Tom Temin and Emily Kopp bring you the latest news affecting the federal community each weekday morning, featuring interviews with top government executives and contractors. Listen live from 6 to 9 a.m. or download archived interviews below.
'Best Place to Work?' -- Not so much
Thursday - 12/13/2012, 6:36am EST
NASA and the Intelligence Community led the pack in employee satisfaction at large agencies in the 2012 edition of The Best Places to Work in the Federal Government, which was released today by The Partnership for Public Service and Deloitte.
While those two agencies may have something to boast about, the annual rankings, which are based on a survey of nearly 700,000 civil servants at 362 agencies and their subcomponents, show an across-the-board decline in employee satisfaction. Governmentwide scores dropped from 64 out of 100 points in 2011 to 60.8 points this year — a 3.2 point decline. That is the greatest change in the annual rankings since the Partnership began publishing them in 2003.
|The Top 10 Best Places to Work - Large Federal Agencies|
|1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration|
|2. Intelligence Community|
|3. Department of State|
|4. Department of Commerce|
|5. Environmental Protection Agency|
|6. Social Security Administration|
|7. Department of the Treasury|
|8. Department of Justice|
|9. Department of Transportation|
|10. Department of the Navy|
By comparison, employee satisfaction in the private sector has remained constant at 70 points, according to the Partnership's technical partner, Hay Group.
"The 2012 Best Places to Work results tell a troubling, but not surprising story," said Max Stier, president and CEO of the Partnership for Public Service in a press release. "Our nation's public servants have sent a clear signal that all is not well. The two year pay freeze, budget cuts and ad hoc hiring freezes are taking their toll - and this is a red flag."
To come up with its rankings, the Partnership uses data from the Office of Personnel Management's Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey. It not only analyzed employee satisfaction in general, but also focused on 10 workplace categories, such as pay, work/life balance, etc., to measure how employees' felt about their agencies.
Although 66.1 percent of agencies declined in their rankings this year, the survey revealed good news for some, with 32.5 percent of agencies improving their scores and 1.4 percent staying the same.
"What we see across government is a decline, the biggest decline since we've been doing the rankings with employee satisfaction and committment with their jobs," Stier told The Federal Drive with Tom Temin and Emily Kopp Thursday.
Steir said he hoped that the numbers would serve as a wakeup call for policymakers to stop making cuts to the federal workforce and concentrate on pursuing better government by investing in the federal employees.
"What you're really seeing is in agencies where you have great leadership, leadership that has focused on trying to improve the performance of their organizations by improving the performance of the workforce, engaging their workforce," Stier said. "You saw increases in those agencies."
|The Top Five Mid-Size Agencies|
|1. Federal Deposit Insurance Commission|
|2. Government Accountability Office|
|3. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (tie)|
|3. Smithsonian Institution (tie)|
|4. Federal Trade Commission|
Agencies had a chance to review the results before the Partnership released its final report. Despite the overall gloomy outlook of the results, Stier said the feedback has been overwhelmingly positive.
"The agencies that are doing better got the kudos that they deserved and need to increase and continue the investments they are making," he said. "And I think the response from agencies that are doing poorly has largely been a wakeup call recognition that they need to do different things and invest more in their workforce."
The top five large agencies in the rankings are NASA, the Intelligence Community, the State and Commerce departments and the Environmental Protection Agency. Mid-size agency leaders are the Federal Deposit Insurance Commission, the Government Accountability Office, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Smithsonian Institution and the Federal Trade Commission. The top five small agencies are the Surface Transportation Board, Congressional Budget Office, Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service, Peace Corps and the National Endowment of the Humanities.
OPM improved the most of any agency, with a 13.3 point increase. Others that moved in a positive direction included the Department of Transportation, the National Credit Union Administration and the Department of Education's Office of the Chief Financial Officer. The Army Audit Agency posted the highest score — 85.7 points — out of the 362 ranked agencies.
|The Top Five Small Agencies|
|1. Surface Transportation Board|
|2. Congressional Budget Office|
|3. Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service|
|4. Peace Corps|
|5. National Endowment for the Humanities|
"The biggest driver of commitment and employee satisfaction is their sense of their leadership and that starts with their first-line supervisors and goes all the way to the top," Stier said. "It's a question of whether the employees feel they are empowered to do their jobs, whether they see line-of-sight between their work and the mission's organization. These are basic management principles and what we need to see is more attention and focus on creating environments for federal employees where they can do the great jobs that they want to."