Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Building the Hybrid Cloud
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Future of Government Data Centers
- The Future of IT: How CIOs Can Enable the Service-Oriented Enterprise
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Mitigating Insider Threats in Virtual & Cloud Environments
- Modern Mission Critical Series
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- The New Generation of Database
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Targeting Advanced Threats: Proven Methods from Detection through Remediation
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- The Truth About IT Opex and Software Defined Networking
- Value of Health IT
- Air Traffic Management Transformation Report
- Cloud First Report
- General Dynamics IT Enterprise Center
- Gov Cloud Minute
- Government in Technology Series
- Homeland Security Cybersecurity Market Report
- National Cybersecurity Awareness Month
- Technology Insights
- The Cyber Security Report
- The Next Generation Cyber Security Experts
Shows & Panels
Monday - Friday, 6-9 a.m.
Host Tom Temin brings you the latest news affecting the federal community each weekday morning, featuring interviews with top government executives and contractors. Listen live from 6 to 9 a.m. or download archived interviews below.
GOP lawmakers urge Obama to drop cyber executive order
Thursday - 10/11/2012, 6:39pm EDT
Doing so could be used as justification by other countries, such as China and Russia, to exert more control over the "non-regulatory, multistakeholder governance model that has allowed the Internet to flourish," wrote Fred Upton (R-Mich.), the chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, along with 10 other lawmakers from both chambers of Congress.
According to draft documents, the cyber order directs the Homeland Security Department to take the lead in setting up a framework to effectively share cyber threat information as well as identifying those private-sector entities deemed critical infrastructure, such as power and water companies.
Letter decries 'top-down' approach
The letter called into question the department's ability to oversee such a project. The lawmakers mentioned a recent Senate subcommittee report that criticized the department's handling of special fusion centers used to track terrorism threat information.
"What our nation and the companies that make up our cyber frontline need, above all else, is flexibility," the letter stated. "At best, creating a top-down, one-size fits all bureaucracy to address cybersecurity will slow our response and impose unnecessary costs on our economy."
The White House indicated last month it was working on an order, following months of debate on cybersecurity legislation in Congress — but no completed bills.
Legislation remains stalled
The House approved by a wide margin the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA) in April. However, the White House threatened to veto it over privacy concerns, and it has barely any traction in the Senate.
Meanwhile, action on a comprehensive Senate bill fizzled over the summer when the bill failed to garner enough support to move forward on a vote.
Two of the sponsors of that bill are divided over the President's intention to issue an executive order.
Sen. Joseph Lieberman (I-Conn.), chairman of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, has urged the President to act on the order.
Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), the committee's ranking member, has said the order shouldn't be a substitute for legislation and that, in fact, it could "send the unintended signal that congressional action is not urgently needed."