Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Connected Government
- Consolidating Mission-critical Systems
- Constituent Servicing
- The Data Privacy Imperative: Safeguarding Sensitive Data
- Eliminating the Pitfalls: Steps to Virtualization in Government
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- Government Cloud Brokerage: Who, What, When, Where, Why?
- Government Mobility
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Mobile Device Management
- The Modern Federal Threat Landscape
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- Understanding the Intersection of Customer Service and Security in the Cloud
Shows & Panels
Monday - Friday, 6-9 a.m.
Hosts Tom Temin and Emily Kopp bring you the latest news affecting the federal community each weekday morning, featuring interviews with top government executives and contractors. Listen live from 6 to 9 a.m. or download archived interviews below.
Analysis: FEHB changes coming to your wallet
Monday - 6/27/2011, 9:08am EDT
Senior Internet Editor
The Office of Personnel Management is changing how Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) carriers determine their group rates.
A new interim rule replaces the current system.
Walton Francis, author of Checkbook's Guide to Health Plans for Federal Employees and Annuitants, told Federal News Radio, it's hard to tell exactly how your premiums might change.
"It's a very opaque rule," said Francis. The rule goes into effect immediately, covering the bids coming in now for next year's plans "and it only effects the community rated plans, which are basically HMOs, and only some of them."
According to Francis, most plans in the FEHB Program are experience-rated. They are not affected by the rule. Community-rated plans are affected. These plans, explained Francis, are generally not national, they are almost all HMOs, and they provide OPM the lowest bid that they provide any other employer. "So if, for example, if an HMO has IBM as a customer in its local area, and they give IBM a certain rate for enrollees, they'd have to give OPM the same rate for federal employees," he explained.
Francis said he believes the intent of the rule is to provide coverage at the lowest possible cost. "What I think OPM is saying in this interim final rule is called the 'most favored nation clause' okay, by the HMOs themselves. They don't like it very much because it's a pretty frugal way of doing business."
The problem, said Francis is that "it's unclear. OPM doesn't really explain what it expects to have happen."
Some of the plan premiums are going to go up, said Francis, "maybe a little more than they would have, but hey, maybe they would have dropped out of the program entirely, in which case people wouldn't have even had the choice, and I think that's what OPM is trying to avoid. They're trying to give the plans a little more flexibility to keep them in the program."