Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Connected Government
- Consolidating Mission-critical Systems
- Constituent Servicing
- Continuous Monitoring: Tools and Techniques for Trustworthy Government IT
- The Data Privacy Imperative: Safeguarding Sensitive Data
- Eliminating the Pitfalls: Steps to Virtualization in Government
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- Government Cloud Brokerage: Who, What, When, Where, Why?
- Government Mobility
- Mission-critical Apps in the Cloud
- Mobile Device Management
- The Modern Federal Threat Landscape
- The Path from Legacy Systems
- Understanding the Intersection of Customer Service and Security in the Cloud
Shows & Panels
Monday - Friday, 6-9 a.m.
Hosts Tom Temin and Emily Kopp bring you the latest news affecting the federal community each weekday morning, featuring interviews with top government executives and contractors. Listen live from 6 to 9 a.m. or download archived interviews below.
Congress considers future of strategic forces
Thursday - 3/3/2011, 9:08am EST
Senior Internet Editor
Congress is debating nearly every function in the federal government. At the top of the list of how the government conducts it's most vital task, protecting the country itself.
Rep. Mike Turner (R-Oh.), chairman of the House Armed Services Committee's Strategic Forces Subcommittee, explains priorities for the subcommittee to Federal News Radio.
Turner said nuclear weapons, nuclear weapons infrastructure, missle defense, missiles and space "are areas that, over the last several years have dominated the news as we've seen effects of the threats of North Korea, Iran, and of course China's anti-satellite activity. So this is an area that we have both emerging threats and current threats, and need to ensure that we're investing both in the missile defense area, but also in preserving our nuclear labs and our nuclear infrastructure."
Turner said the nation needs a new weapons system that is secure and safe and effective. "That doesn't necessarily mean that we have to build new weapons, but it does mean that we have to invest in the weapons that we have, ensuring that they're capable, ensuring that they themselves don't pose a threat."
Asked about missile defense in general, Turner said "this is a really neat issue because, if you think of how partisan the issue of missile defense has been, it certainly has evolved now to a bipartisan issue. we're no longer talking about whether or not we should have missile defense when we have the threat of North Korea and Iran and their nuclear programs and also their missile programs." The question now, according to Turner, is "what is the mix of missile defense, what is the technology that's going to be deployed and where."
"This (missile defense) is an area that certainly makes our country safer, it is worth the investment and we're seeing great strides, as we usually do, and the innovation that we have is the spirit of American inventiveness."