Shows & Panels
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- The Big Data Dilemma
- Carrying On with Continuity of Operations
- Connected Government
- Constituent Servicing
- Continuous Monitoring: Tools and Techniques for Trustworthy Government IT
- The Cyber Imperative
- Cyber Solutions for 2013 and Beyond
- Expert Voices
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal IT Challenge
- Federal Tech Talk
- Mission-critical Apps in the Cloud
- The Path from Legacy Systems
- The Real Deal on Digital Government
- The Reality of Continuous Monitoring... Is Your Agency Secure?
- Veterans in Private Sector: Making the Transition
Shows & Panels
Monday - Friday, 6-9 a.m.
Hosts Tom Temin and Emily Kopp bring you the latest news affecting the federal community each weekday morning, featuring interviews with top government executives and contractors. Listen live from 6 to 9 a.m. or download archived interviews on our daily show blogs.
VA using hospital data to improve service
Wednesday - 2/2/2011, 9:41am EST
Senior Internet Editor
Doctor Robert Petzel, Under Secretary for Health at VA, told Federal News Radio the data is collected for two reasons. "One," said Petzel, "is that we use this information to improve the way we do our business. That's the fundamentally important thing about this."
And then there's the ability to use the data outside the department.
We need to be transparent. We need to be sure that our patients, the public, Congress, everybody sees our performance. We need to be very transparent, so that they trust that we're being straightforward with them, so that our patients trust that we are actually telling them how we are doing and this is the real picture of the quality of care within the VA.
Petzel said while the data is reported once a year, it's collected on a monthly and quarterly basis, then used in a quarterly fashion to hold facility directors accountable.
It's made available to the entire system so that everyone can see who needs to improve in which areas, "and you'd be surprised," sais Petzel, "how little interest there is in being the last person on that list."
Once the data is opened up and posted where the public has access to it, admitted Petzel, there's a flaw in the process.
I'll be very candid with you: I think it's a little bit difficult to interpret this stuff on data.gov if you don't have a little bit of a sophisticated understanding of medicine and medical practice. And I think one of the challenges that we have is to make this data understandable by the people who use our system and the people who are interested in looking at how our system performs that are outside of medicine. The medical community understands what we're saying in this report, I think, quite well.
Petzel said while the accessibility of the data works, understanding it is "a definite issue for us, and that is making this stuff as simple and understandable as we possibly can and we are continuously working on doing that."