Shows & Panels
- Accelerate and Streamline for Better Customer Service
- Ask the CIO
- The Big Data Dilemma
- Carrying On with Continuity of Operations
- Client Virtualization Solutions
- Data Protection in a Virtual World
- Expert Voices
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal IT Challenge
- Federal Tech Talk
- Feds in the Cloud
- Health IT: A Policy Change Agent
- Improving Healthcare Outcomes through IT Policy
- IT Innovation in the New Era of Government
- Making Dollars And Sense Out of Data Center Consolidation
- Navigating the Private Cloud
- One Step to the Cloud, Two Steps Toward Innovation
- Path to FDCCI Compliance
- Take Command of Your Mobility Initiative
Shows & Panels
Opinion: no COLA in 2011 makes sense
Thursday - 10/21/2010, 10:31am EDT
Senior Internet Editor
Federal News Radio
While some federal retirees have voiced their displeasure with the fact there will be no cost of living adjustment in 2011, others say that's a good thing.
Jason Fitchner, a former deputy commissioner at the Social Security Administration and now a senior research fellow at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University told Federal News Radio that's exactly what should happen.
Since 1975, said Fitchner, COLAs have been tied to the consumer price index (CPI) in order "to keep politics out of deciding when, or when not, to have a COLA."
Fitchner points to a big increase in the cost of living in 2008. That led to a 5.8 percent COLA for 2009.
"Since then," said Fitchner, "prices have dropped significantly," with no decrease in monthly Social Security payments.
"The good news is Social Security benefits never go down," said Fitchner. That's why, in 2009, no one lost money in the payments.
"Social Security benefits were basically designed to keep people out of poverty," said Fitchner, "and they do a fantastic job of doing that. In fact, actually, for poverty rates, seniors saw a reduction last year."
In light of all this, Fitchner said any notion of an extra $250 payment to Social Security recipients would be wrong. If the idea is to keep politics out of determining Social Security payments, the bonus check would be "just injecting it back in again."
Plus, he says, "If you're giving one group of people a check, why not give it to everybody else? And I think that's one of the problems that people would see this as."