Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Building the Hybrid Cloud
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- The New Generation of Database
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Targeting Advanced Threats: Proven Methods from Detection through Remediation
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- Value of Health IT
Shows & Panels
Johnson planning bill to change VA small business contracting process
Tuesday - 8/7/2012, 5:34am EDT
"It makes absolutely no sense that a veteran who owns 51 percent of the company, which is the majority of the company ... would not be considered in control of the company," said Rep. Bill Johnson (R-Ohio), in an exclusive interview with Federal News Radio. "I don't know of any company where any one person, other than a sole proprietorship, has 100 percent control."
Johnson, who is chairman of the House Veterans Affairs Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee, did not provide specifics about the bill's new requirements. But he did say the legislation will address what he believes is VA's "misinterpretation" of current law.
Rep. Bill Johnson (R-Ohio) (Photo:House.gov)
The 100 percent provision creates a "bright line" and removes subjectivity from the process examiners use to decide whether a business qualifies for the service-disabled veteran set-aside program, testified Thomas Leney, executive director of VA's Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization, in a subcommittee hearing Thursday.
"We have improved our quality control and become more aggressive in referring firms that we suspect are misrepresenting their status," Leney said in written testimony. "In FY 2011 we referred 25 firms to the Office of Inspector General (OIG) for investigation as possible misrepresentation. So far in FY 2012, we have referred 59 firms."
But Johnson questioned the VA's interpretation, saying the rule falls short of the law's intent to ensure contracting opportunities for service-disabled veterans.
"We try to stay away from legislative solutions because it's better when the VA understands the need for change," he told Federal News Radio. "But when the VA is reading part of the law, but not the intent of the law, and interpreting the language in a way that is ... making it difficult for veterans to get verified and become a contractor," Congress must step in.
Scott Denniston, executive director of National Veteran-Owned Business Association
"It's a step in the right direction, but it's a question of how far you want to take that step," he said. "I think the system is inherently flawed when half the people that apply get turned down."
Denniston, who is now executive director of the National Veteran Small Business Coalition, said he agrees with Johnson that improvements are necessary. But he stopped short of endorsing the idea of legislation.
"Personally, I don't think new legislation is necessary as much as Congress getting VA to write reasonable rules and interpret them reasonably and consistently," he said. "That could be done over lunch between the congressman and the [VA secretary]."
VA said it will work with Congress to address concerns about the rules.
"VA is constantly looking to improve its processes for ensuring eligible veterans have priority in getting VA contracts," said Josephine Schuda, a spokeswoman for VA.