Shows & Panels
Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- American Readiness: Renewable Power and Efficiency Technologies
- Ask the CIO
- Building the Hybrid Cloud
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal News Radio's National Cyber Security Awareness Month Special Panel Discussion
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Future of Government Data Centers
- The Future of IT: How CIOs Can Enable the Service-Oriented Enterprise
- Government Perspectives on Mobility and the Cloud
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Mitigating Insider Threats in Virtual & Cloud Environments
- Modern Mission Critical Series
- The New Generation of Database
- Reimagining the Next Generation of Government
- Targeting Advanced Threats: Proven Methods from Detection through Remediation
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- The Truth About IT Opex and Software Defined Networking
- Air Traffic Management Transformation Report
- Cloud First Report
- General Dynamics IT Enterprise Center
- Gov Cloud Minute
- Government in Technology Series
- Homeland Security Cybersecurity Market Report
- National Cybersecurity Awareness Month
- Technology Insights
- The Cyber Security Report
- The Next Generation Cyber Security Experts
Shows & Panels
Layoffs, furloughs ... Take a deep breath
Thursday - 11/15/2012, 2:00am EST
This time last year, some federal workers were concerned about an all-but- nonexistent proposal that would have reduced their retirement benefits slightly: The long-feared (never approved) formula change that would base annuities on the employees highest five years (rather than the current high-three) years of service.
Workers — both long-time employees and newcomers — were worried about major changes in pay and benefits that were being worked up by congressional groups, a blue-ribbon panel endorsed by the White House, a bipartisan congressional group headed by Vice President Joe Biden and a budget plan from Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) who was later the GOP VP candidate.
What happened, in short, is nothing. None of the proposed or recommended changes happened. The high-three to high-five switch never came up, although it was the one change most feds seemed to fear.
What did happen was bad enough. The White House did impose a two-year (2011-2012) pay freeze. That has been extended at least through March 31 of next year.
But the big threats — slightly smaller pension payments, higher health care costs, changes in retirees' cost-of-living calculation — never saw the light of day. Nothing happened.
Now, feds who are worried are focused on a new set of threats: Sequestration, the fiscal cliff, gridlock in Congress that could — worst- case scenario — cost some people their jobs and mean furloughs for others. There is even the possibility that the pay freeze will be extended another year or two. If that happens, some retirement-eligible feds say they will pull the plug. Get out and enjoy themselves. Or get another job — if the economy improves to the point where they can find one.
The automatic 8 percent to 10 percent cuts (with some exemptions for Defense and the VA) could begin in January. The Congressional Budget Office's if-it-happens assessment is grim
But Congress and the White House could "fix" the problem. Both sides have said they are willing to compromise and reach a bipartisan agreement even as they take pot shots at each other. Or history could repeat itself.
Something similar happened in the 1980s. Automatic cuts were triggered. It was, according to some, the end of civilization as we know it. Red flags went up all over the place. Unions warned their members. Contractor groups braced for the worst. The trade media (including yours truly) went on high alert. It was horrible and wonderful at the same time. Except...
Congress and the White House (finally) showed some sense. After doing nothing, except causing the problem, they stepped in and did something. They decided that the Defense Department (remember the Cold War?) was too important to take the hits. Then the VA, followed by the IRS. And on it went until, within a short time, there were few places left that weren't deemed essential in some form. The fall from that fiscal cliff, at least then, wasn't very far.
So what's going to happen this time? If you've been around awhile, your guess is as good as, or better, than most. Sound off!
NEARLY USELESS FACTOID
By Jack Moore
Fish don't cry. They do, however yawn, cough and burp.
(Source: Life's Little Mysteries)
MORE FROM FEDERAL NEWS RADIO
official time reports likely to rekindle federal pay debate
Two new reports expected in the coming month are expected to rekindle the always heated pay debate. The Federal Salary Council in the coming weeks will make new recommendations to change which counties get locality pay increases. At the same time, the Office of Personnel Management is finalizing its 2011 report on how much time employees spend on union activities.
New marketing chief helps USPS
practice what it preaches
Nagisa Manabe hasn't spent her entire career with the Postal Service but, after just six short months, she's making her presence known. Under her direction, the agency has committed to spending 15-20 percent of its marketing dollars on direct mail - the same amount it recommends to its own customers. Her goal - getting the Postal Service out of the red through the development of new innovative products and the use of effective marketing techniques. The new chief marketing and sales officer brings with her a career's worth of experience from the private sector - including jobs with powerhouse companies like Coca-Cola, Campbell's Soup and the liquor industry.
Congress expands whistleblower
protections in bill
The whistleblower protection measure, approved by voice vote in the Senate and sent to the president Tuesday, was the product of 13 years of work by organizations pushing for greater protections for the federal workforce. The legislation closes loopholes created by court rulings, which removed protections for whistle-blowers. One loophole specified that whistle-blowers were only protected when they were the first to report misconduct.