Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Connected Government
- Consolidating Mission-critical Systems
- Constituent Servicing
- The Data Privacy Imperative: Safeguarding Sensitive Data
- Eliminating the Pitfalls: Steps to Virtualization in Government
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- Government Cloud Brokerage: Who, What, When, Where, Why?
- Government Mobility
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Mobile Device Management
- The Modern Federal Threat Landscape
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- Understanding the Intersection of Customer Service and Security in the Cloud
Shows & Panels
Agency Instability at GSA
In April 2010, it will be two years since the General Services Administration has had a permanent leader. Federal News Radio's Jason Miller examines what effect the lack of permanent leadership is having on the agency - and other agencies in the federal government in our series, Agency Instability at GSA.
Agency Instability: GSA begins to feel toll of not having permanent leader
Wednesday - 1/13/2010, 12:25pm EST
By Jason Miller
Federal News Radio
In April, it will have been two years since the General Services Administration has had a permanent leader.
GSA now is on its fourth acting administrator, Stephen Leeds, since Lurita Doan was forced to resign after a controversial two years at the helm.
And there doesn't seem to be any end of the parade of acting administrators in sight.
President Obama's nominee Martha Johnson is stuck in the Senate.
After the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee approved Johnson's nomination in May, Sen. Christopher Bond (R-Mo.) placed a hold on Johnson in July that has little to do with her qualifications or background. Instead, Bond is unhappy with GSA's plans to build a federal building in downtown Kansas City.
Bond's hold on Johnson is the latest in a long line of morale-busting challenges that is starting to have a significant effect on GSA, says current and former agency officials.
"The continued absence of an administrator for this period of time is making it more difficult for us to move forward with confidence that we are going in the right direction," says a GSA source, who requested anonymity because of the subject matter is sensitive. "Even if Martha were being briefed daily and gave her blessing on everything going on--of course no one could admit that and I don't think it's true because to do so would further jeopardize her confirmation and make the Senator more upset-it's really just an untenable situation and it continues with little hope in sight that we will get some sort of relief."
Instead of some sort of resolution, GSA, instead, is seeing long-time career officials retire and a high-ranking political official surprisingly resign to return to the private sector. GSA deputy administrator Barney Brasseux retired earlier this month after 17 years at the agency and nearly 28 years in government. Tyree Varnado, the deputy commissioner of the Federal Acquisition Service, also retired in January after more than 35 years in government, most of which was with GSA.
While Brasseux and Varnado's decisions were not surprising, Danielle Germain, the GSA chief of staff who was brought on specifically to work for Johnson, surprised many in and of government by resigning to work for the National Academy of Public Administration after only six months on the job.
All of this turnover and change is perpetuating a growing uneasiness among employees as their confidence in the long term success of the agency fades, according to people inside and outside of GSA
"There is a growing frustration level among employees," says another GSA source. "We have a powerful role in the government process and that role is being diminished."
The official adds that the lack of a permanent administrator is affecting the development of the agency's strategic vision because acting administrators worry more about the day-to-day operations.
And former GSA officials say the lack of a political appointee is leading to other senior leaders focusing on themselves and not the agency as a whole.
"There are opportunities for GSA to evolve and many things we ought to be doing to evolve and improve, and quite frankly there's not as much enthusiasm for making these changes and achieving those evolutions in the absence of a full time administrator," the first GSA source says. "I think it's a combination of intentional foot dragging where clearly there are some who are not on board and we don't have the camaraderie that you would have in permanent situation. And there are a number of us for sure who believe we weren't given a day in court to make a case about the way things are going and who believe as soon as the new administrator comes in, we will try to undue those things shouldn't have been done by the caretaker."
At the same time, however, nearly every current and former official interviewed for this story says GSA is meeting their day-in and day-out mission without regard to who sits in the administrator's office.
In the past few years, GSA awarded the multi-million dollar Alliant technology contract, spent more than $300 million on new fuel efficient cars for the government and continues to see its revenue from its schedule contracts and governmentwide acquisition vehicles increase at rates not seen in five years. And, the Obama administration is giving GSA more responsibility with everything from cloud computing to making the government more energy efficient to leading the open government and transparency initiative. Add to that, GSA received more than $5 billion from the Recovery Act to improve federal buildings.