Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- The New Generation of Database
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- Value of Health IT
Shows & Panels
SES reforms moving too slowly, SEA says
Friday - 6/24/2011, 9:18pm EDT
By Courtney Thompson
Federal News Radio
The Obama administration's initiatives to improve conditions for members of the Senior Executive Service (SES) have not been moving as successfully as they could, according to the association representing this group.
Carol Bonosaro, the president of the Senior Executive Association (SEA), said at a conference last week that the outcome of the President's Management Council's "very large" and "ambitious" agenda was unclear.
The PMC's goal is targeted at improving collaboration between the SES and political officials through senior leadership engagement, career development, recruitment and performance management. But the administration's decisions to freeze pay and limit bonuses for SESers continue to fuel an adverse relationship between federal executives and the council.
"The SES pay for performance system has been dealt two serious blows," Bonosaro said in regards to pay freeze and a reduction in eligible senior executives considered for performance awards.
Bonosaro said that the administration is taking a "defensive" stance toward career executives.
One example of this defensive stance, Bonosaro said, is the Office of Personal Management's decision to remove the presidential rank award winners from their website. She said that SEA will continue to ask OPM for the names of these winners, their accomplishments and the money that they helped the government to save.
Bonosaro said OPM's decision to remove the names may have stemmed from fear of public criticism over the amount of money spent on performance awards considering the nation's financial condition. She said OPM's decision has made the already sour relationship worse.
"I think it's rather demoralizing when people who have really accomplished tremendous things on behalf of their agencies, and been granted these awards, are essentially told that no one should know what they've done or that they've won it," Bonosaro said.
Additionally, the SEA is advocating changes to the PMC's performance management goals.
Particularly, Bonosaro said that the Qualitative Review Boards (QRBs), which approve executives for the SES, have been under scrutiny for some time. She added that opponents of QRBs argue that it has "no added value" and "only serves to lengthen the hiring process."
"The association strongly supports the QRB process as a mechanism to prevent politicization of the corps," Bonosaro said.
To help QRBs, Bonosaro said that the association is requesting that the boards serve as a standing committee or function for more than one day.
Bonosaro said that the SEA is particularly concerned with OPM's complicated process of the translation of resumes, interviews and accomplishment statements to Executive Core Qualification (ECQs) , which the board reviews to make its decision on who is brought into the SES.
"I think making the process less complex is fine," she said. "Our bottom line is a concern that the system not be dumbed down; that in the end, there is assurance that those who were selected do meet the Executive Core Qualifications."
Bonosaro also wants the PMC to focus more on onboarding. She said the goal is to provide coaching and mentoring for a "smoother" transition of new senior executives into the SES and also to ensure their success.
As for military hiring, Bonosaro said that the gradual increase of retired military officers in agencies such as the Department of Defense is a concern, because it is "discouraging to civilians that want to pursue a career development path."
"No one wants to argue that retired officers should not have an opportunity to serve in these positions; but the question is: how do we improve the training that's available to the civilians and how do we give them an equal chance when they're up against, I think, that kind of talent?" she said.
And when it comes to attracting talent, Bonosaro said OPM's requirement for all agencies to list their executives' education, skills and experiences will help to improve recruitment as well.
Bonosaro said that SEA is taking advantage of opportunities to give feedback to Congress about SESers' challenges and possible legislation is in the works.
Bill Bransford, SEA's general counsel, said opportunities to find common ground with Congress on changes to the SES reform legislation have not been easy.
"We have to deal with congressmen and senators in committees that have concern and responsibility for federal employee issues, who are down-right hostile to federal employees. So it's become even more of a challenge," Bransford said.
On the other hand, he added, many in Congress and the SEA agree that senior executives are "underpaid" and that career leadership and accountability are necessary in the workforce.
Bransford said that in the near future Sen. Daniel Akaka (D-Hawaii) will propose the SES Reform Act, which includes language to increase pay, improve career development, employee accountability and diversity. He said Akaka likely will make some changes to the original proposal. Bransford said he expects a companion bill in the House also to be introduced.