Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Building the Hybrid Cloud
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Future of Government Data Centers
- The Future of IT: How CIOs Can Enable the Service-Oriented Enterprise
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Mitigating Insider Threats in Virtual & Cloud Environments
- Modern Mission Critical Series
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- The New Generation of Database
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Targeting Advanced Threats: Proven Methods from Detection through Remediation
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- The Truth About IT Opex and Software Defined Networking
- Value of Health IT
- Air Traffic Management Transformation Report
- Cloud First Report
- General Dynamics IT Enterprise Center
- Gov Cloud Minute
- Government in Technology Series
- Homeland Security Cybersecurity Market Report
- National Cybersecurity Awareness Month
- Technology Insights
- The Cyber Security Report
- The Next Generation Cyber Security Experts
Shows & Panels
IRS head apologizes to ID theft victims
Friday - 6/3/2011, 8:29am EDT
By Jared Serbu
Federal News Radio
Victims of identity theft who say they received shabby treatment from the IRS got a personal and public apology from the agency's commissioner on Capitol Hill Thursday as lawmakers explored ways to tighten the agency's internal controls to reduce the number of refunds it sends out to scammers.
In addition to testimony from Douglas Shulman, the IRS chief, members of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee's Subcommittee on Government Organization heard from three victims of identity theft of a very specific kind. Scammers had stolen enough personal information to file phony tax returns in their names and get refunds.
When the real taxpayers tried to file, the IRS told them their returns were duplicates. That led to, in at least one case, more than a year of waiting and hassle before they got the refunds they were due.
"I just want to personally apologize to the taxpayers sitting behind me," Shulman said. "I know they had a very frustrating experience with the IRS. I always stress to our employees that we need to walk in each taxpayer's shoes and understand their specific situation and needs."
But the victims who testified said that's not what they encountered.
Sharon Hawa, of Bronx, N.Y., first had her tax return rejected as a duplicate in 2009. She said she was scared and in shock.
"I immediately took measures to secure all of my personal assets, credit reports and accounts," she said. "I mailed in hard copies of my returns to various IRS addresses, as instructed by different units within the IRS. After 12 months of back and forth confusion, the IRS' identity protection specialized unit assigned me to an incredibly rude and hard-to-reach taxpayer advocate, where I had to explain my situation, resubmit the documents, and prove my identity all over again. It took a painstaking 14 months before I finally received my $6,604 refund. Meanwhile, I had to take on a second job to support myself and spend a lot of time, money and effort drafting letters and sending in the necessary information."
But that wasn't the end. This year, someone got a fraudulent refund using her social security number once again. Hawa said she has yet to successfully reach an identity theft specialist at the IRS for this year's case.
The IRS stresses that it is not the cause of identity theft in these cases. Thieves have stolen personal information in some other way and then used it to file for a fraudulent refund.
But Shulman said the agency is focused on improving its ability to automatically spot those phony tax returns before a refund is sent out, a task made more difficult by the fact that the IRS typically does not know a taxpayer's true earnings at the time he or she files the return.
"We put markers on accounts, which puts heightened scrutiny on the accounts (when they have been involved in fraud)," he said. "The key to those markers is setting up the right filters that block the criminals and don't put too much burden on the victims. While not perfect, we've gotten a lot better. Two years ago, 80 percent of the returns that were tripped by our filters ended up being legitimate tax returns. This year, that's almost reversed. 75 percent of the tripped returns ended up being the fraudulent taxpayers. So we're going to keep getting better every year."
The IRS will need to, since the crime is growing every year. According to the Government Accountability Office, there were nearly 52,000 identity theft-related fraud incidents on tax returns in 2008. In 2010 however, the number grew to 248,000.
Shulman said that since identity theft is now a major organized crime, syndicates may be responsible for many of those numbers, meaning the 2010 crimes were not committed by 248,000 individual criminals. But lawmakers are concerned that a lack of prosecutions in refund fraud cases is providing a big incentive for criminals to keep doing it.
Edolphus Towns, the ranking member of the subcommittee, said that's somewhat understandable from the IRS' point of view, given its limited investigative resources.
"I mean, how much do you want to spend to collect $500? I think we have to look at this, and I think we have a role here, and it's not just the blame game," he said. "I think it's that we do some things legislatively to make it possible that anybody who takes somebody else's money is charged."