Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Connected Government
- Consolidating Mission-critical Systems
- Constituent Servicing
- Continuous Monitoring: Tools and Techniques for Trustworthy Government IT
- The Data Privacy Imperative: Safeguarding Sensitive Data
- Eliminating the Pitfalls: Steps to Virtualization in Government
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- Government Cloud Brokerage: Who, What, When, Where, Why?
- Government Mobility
- Mission-critical Apps in the Cloud
- Mobile Device Management
- The Modern Federal Threat Landscape
- The Path from Legacy Systems
- Understanding the Intersection of Customer Service and Security in the Cloud
Shows & Panels
Pay Agent rejects new locality pay areas
Monday - 5/16/2011, 2:21pm EDT
Federal News Radio
The President's Pay Agent is rejecting the Federal Salary Council's recommendation to expand or increase the number of areas eligible for locality pay adjustments.
The Council had recommended creating new locality pay areas for Albany, N.Y, Albuquerque, Bakersfield, Calif., Charlotte, N.C., Harrisburg, Pa., and Portland, Maine. The council also recommended adding Lansing, Mich., to the Detroit locality pay area. Currently, there are 32 locality pay areas.
According to the Council's December 2010 report, about 20,000 GS employees are impacted by pay gaps in these locations.
Locality pay is the percentage increase above the base pay adjusted for location. Since 1994, the Federal Employees Pay Comparability Act has allowed for adjustments above the General Schedule if a location's non-federal salary exceeds the federal salary by more than 5 percent.
The entire model and methodology of estimating pay gaps needs to be re-evaluated before changes are made, the Pay Agent said in its report. Members of the Pay Agent include Secretary of Labor Hilda Solis, Office of Personnel Management Director John Berry and Office of Management and Budget Director Jacob Lew.
The Pay Agent also took issue with instituting one locality pay increase across different jobs and pointed to the austere economic times.
"We do not believe it is appropriate to make substantive changes in the General Schedule locality pay system at this time given the anticipated migration to the use of a new survey methodology ... the continuing economic emergency affecting the general welfare, and the recently enacted legislation freezing federal pay in 2011 and 2012," according to the report.