Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Building the Hybrid Cloud
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Future of Government Data Centers
- The Future of IT: How CIOs Can Enable the Service-Oriented Enterprise
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Mitigating Insider Threats in Virtual & Cloud Environments
- Modern Mission Critical Series
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- The New Generation of Database
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Targeting Advanced Threats: Proven Methods from Detection through Remediation
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- The Truth About IT Opex and Software Defined Networking
- Value of Health IT
- Air Traffic Management Transformation Report
- Cloud First Report
- General Dynamics IT Enterprise Center
- Gov Cloud Minute
- Government in Technology Series
- Homeland Security Cybersecurity Market Report
- National Cybersecurity Awareness Month
- Technology Insights
- The Cyber Security Report
- The Next Generation Cyber Security Experts
Shows & Panels
Army's BRAC traffic plan flawed
Thursday - 4/21/2011, 12:37pm EDT
Senior Internet Editor
The Defense Department Inspector General has found some serious flaws in the Army's report on the traffic and environmental impacts of the BRAC move. Rep. Jim Moran (D-Va.) says he has forwarded the report to officials in Alexandria and Fairfax County, encouraging them to sue the Pentagon.
A report from the Inspector General found that in 2008 when the Army predicted the impact on traffic and the environment of moving 6,400 defense workers to the massive Mark Center office complex in Alexandria, it "assumed no change in existing or baseline traffic conditions and volume from 2008 to 2011."
Instead, the IG points to reports that find "significantly greater traffic congestions than predicted" in the 2008 report.
The 2008 report concluded that there would be no significant impact on traffic from the Base Realignment and Closure moves.
The IG's report recommends the Army go back revise the impact statement, update its traffic management plan and conduct a more technically robust, traffic impact analysis.
If the Army's original Finding of No Significant Impact (FNSI) is reversed, Defense may be required to help pay for transportation improvements.
Moran told the Washington Post he'd like to see the IG's report used to file suit in U.S. District Court asking for an injunction to block the BRAC move.
WTOP.com reports local leaders are digesting the 200-page report before deciding whether to go to court.
Moran told Federal News Radio he expects the increased traffic will be "a nightmare because we're going to have delays of as much as an (additional) hour for everyone that lives south of Seminary Road," once the move is underway.
(Copyright 2011 by FederalNewsRadio.com. All Rights Reserved.)