Shows & Panels
Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- American Readiness: Renewable Power and Efficiency Technologies
- Ask the CIO
- Building the Hybrid Cloud
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Delivering the Digital Government Mission
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal News Radio's National Cyber Security Awareness Month Special Panel Discussion
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Future of Government Data Centers
- The Future of IT: How CIOs Can Enable the Service-Oriented Enterprise
- Government Perspectives on Mobility and the Cloud
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Mitigating Insider Threats in Virtual & Cloud Environments
- Modern Mission Critical Series
- The New Generation of Database
- Reimagining the Next Generation of Government
- Targeting Advanced Threats: Proven Methods from Detection through Remediation
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- The Truth About IT Opex and Software Defined Networking
- Air Traffic Management Transformation Report
- Cloud First Report
- General Dynamics IT Enterprise Center
- Gov Cloud Minute
- Government in Technology Series
- Homeland Security Cybersecurity Market Report
- National Cybersecurity Awareness Month
- Technology Insights
- The Cyber Security Report
- The Next Generation Cyber Security Experts
Shows & Panels
House lawmakers uneasy about hiring reforms
Thursday - 5/20/2010, 6:54am EDT
By Jason Miller
Federal News Radio
House and Senate lawmakers don't seem to be on the same page when it comes to federal hiring reforms.
The day after the Senate passed a bill that endorses many of the same changes to the federal hiring process that the White House wants, House lawmakers expressed serious concerns about those same proposed modifications.
Rep. Stephen Lynch (D-Mass.), chairman of the Oversight and Government Subcommittee on the Federal Workforce, the Postal Service and the District of Columbia, says the proposed reforms could have a severe impact on group of potential employees.
"I'm concerned that the non-competitive processes that have evolved would diminish the number of veterans that are hired," Lynch says during a hearing on the administration's proposed hiring reforms Wednesday. "I've seen from this position as chairman attempts by some agencies to completely circumvent the veterans hiring process and not just with a few people, but to obtain basically a waiver from hiring veterans and that concerns me greatly."
Lynch points to the current state of veterans hiring where at most agencies veterans make up less than 10 percent of the entire workforce. Lynch says beyond the Defense, the Veterans Affairs and the Homeland Security departments, the government's track record hasn't been good.
Meanwhile, the Senate Tuesday night passed the Federal Hiring Process Improvement Act (S. 736), sponsored by Sens. Daniel Akaka (D-Hawaii) and George Voinovich (R-Ohio).
The bill would require agencies to:
- Develop strategic workforce plans, addressing hiring projections and critical skills gaps in the workforce;
- Post clear job announcements in plain writing;
- No longer require knowledge, skills and abilities (KSAs) essays, instead letting applicants submit resumes and cover letters;
- Provide timely notification to applicants of their application status, taking no more than 10 business days after a position is filled to notify non-successful candidates;
- Take an average of 80 days from the time a manager decides to fill a vacancy to the time an offer is made for the vacant position;
- Keep an inventory of all applicants who elect to be considered for other federal vacancies; and
- Measure the effectiveness of hiring efforts and reforms.
A Voinovich spokeswoman says there is no House companion bill.
At the House hearing, Lynch wanted to know more about how OPM would ensure veterans were not getting short changed.
The Obama administration launched a veterans hiring initiative in November and 26 agencies now have full-time veteran employee coordinators, says John Berry, the director of the Office of Personnel Management.
"OPM's strategic plan focuses on dismantling the barriers to veterans, increase employment counseling, develop a marketing campaign aimed to bring more veterans into the civilian agencies and developing a one-stop gateway for information on veterans hiring staffed by veterans," Berry says.
OPM and the Chief Human Officer's Council will meet in the next month or so to set specific goals for veterans hiring in 2011.
"What we are looking at as an approach that is being discussed, if you are in the lowest category, 5-to-10 percent hiring, then you've got to do more and we will put a higher burden on your shoulders to catch up," Berry says. "If you are at DoD and you already at 50 percent, they are not going to be able to have that same percentage increase. So we are asking the agencies at the top to hold the line while we bring those at the bottom up."
He adds that OPM is in the 25-to-30 percent range for hiring veterans.
But that is not the only issue Lynch and other subcommittee members were concerned about.
Lynch and several others also wondered why the administration didn't end the Federal Career Internship Program instead of spending the time reviewing it.
Rep. Eleanor Holmes-Norton (D-D.C.) asked Berry why no one has been overseeing this program, which the National Treasury Employees Union and others believe is out of control.
Lynch says the number of students in the FCIP grew to almost 28,000 in 2009 from 400 in 2003.
"It's just exploded in its utilization," he says. "I'm concerned some agencies are using it to circumvent the competitive hiring practice. The other is the human side of this. We have some very talented career federal employees and the impact on them when a new administration comes in and all of a sudden they start hiring interns through a non-competitive, closed process and these new people parachute in at a higher rate of pay and at a higher rate of responsibility than the person who has been very competently doing that job for a long time. That is devastating to the morale of our federal employees."