Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Connected Government
- Consolidating Mission-critical Systems
- Constituent Servicing
- Continuous Monitoring: Tools and Techniques for Trustworthy Government IT
- The Data Privacy Imperative: Safeguarding Sensitive Data
- Eliminating the Pitfalls: Steps to Virtualization in Government
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- Government Cloud Brokerage: Who, What, When, Where, Why?
- Government Mobility
- Mission-critical Apps in the Cloud
- Mobile Device Management
- The Modern Federal Threat Landscape
- The Path from Legacy Systems
- Understanding the Intersection of Customer Service and Security in the Cloud
Shows & Panels
On Convicts, Con Artists, and Contracts
Friday - 2/27/2009, 1:27pm EST
Senior Internet Editor
The government's contracting black list isn't stopping criminals and other banned parties from receiving federal contracts.
The Government Accountability Office has revealed a list of companies who got millions of dollars. Among them, a firm whose president tried to sell parts to North Korea that could be used for making nuclear bombs.
The GAO informed the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee yesterday that part of the problem is because agencies incorrectly use a database listing thousands of banned contractors.
Rep. Edolphus Towns (D-N.Y.), chairman of the committee, tells FederalNewsRadio there's too much at stake to make those sorts of errors.
"Oh, it's just a few human errors." That the numbers were put in wrong or "we have to now get some people to make certain that they take their time in putting this in" and answers like that, which to me -- this was not satisfactory and we will continue to look into and to talk, but if not -- they don't correct it,... I think we will have no choice but to come up with some legislation to help them to deal it.
Contracting officers are required to check the "Excluded Parties List System" database, maintained by the General Services Administration, but according to the GAO, that isn't happening or, in some cases, the officers "willfully ignored the suspension and debarment notice."
In his opening statement for the hearing, Towns wondered "This begs the question: what is the point of having suspension and debarment regulations, if our own agencies disregard them?"
Towns tells the Federal Drive he found the initial reaction from GSA disturbing.
"Oh! The GAO only found 25 cases." But they found 35 themselves. ... And of course my answer to that is that my dad says "find one problem, there's two and if you find two, there's four." And of course, to me, the GAO found 25, but you can be assured there's probably a lot more. And that's the kind of thing that we have to make certain that we deal with.
The goal, says Towns is to "make this system really work."
On the Web:
Committee on Oversight & Government Reform - Opening Statement of Chairman Towns (doc)
(Copyright 2009 by FederalNewsRadio.com. All Rights Reserved.)