Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Building the Hybrid Cloud
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Future of Government Data Centers
- The Future of IT: How CIOs Can Enable the Service-Oriented Enterprise
- Government Perspectives on Mobility and the Cloud
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Mitigating Insider Threats in Virtual & Cloud Environments
- Modern Mission Critical Series
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- The New Generation of Database
- Reimagining the Next Generation of Government
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Targeting Advanced Threats: Proven Methods from Detection through Remediation
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- The Truth About IT Opex and Software Defined Networking
- Value of Health IT
- Air Traffic Management Transformation Report
- Cloud First Report
- General Dynamics IT Enterprise Center
- Gov Cloud Minute
- Government in Technology Series
- Homeland Security Cybersecurity Market Report
- National Cybersecurity Awareness Month
- Technology Insights
- The Cyber Security Report
- The Next Generation Cyber Security Experts
Shows & Panels
Analysis: Defense acquisition should consider Congress, lobbyists as stakeholders
Monday - 10/8/2012, 7:07pm EDT
But other key players — such as congressional staff and lobbyists — also have some skin in the game.
Understanding their role in the defense acquisition process was the focus of a special forum hosted by the Defense Acquisition University Alumni Association last week.
Bill Bahnmaier, the president of the association, told In Depth with Francis Rose the way the roles interrelate is often obscured because there's rarely a "direct link" between them.
The program manager for a particular acquisition program usually deals with the vendor through its respective program manager — not the company's lobbyists.
Conversely, program managers work with Capitol Hill primarily through the service's legislative liaison, as opposed to dealing directly with congressional staff.
One of the purposes of the forum was to better elucidate those lines of communication, Bahnmaier said.
"We want to teach the integrity of the system, that there is a process we have to follow," he said. "And if you don't follow that process it can circumvent and undermine the budget process."
'A loftier goal'
Contrary to their reputations, both staffers and lobbyists have "a loftier goal than just looking out for their company or their congressman," Bahnmaier said.
"I think most staffers are really interested in the defense of the United States and having the proper systems in place and capabilities with the Armed Forces," he said.
Lobbyists, obviously, are interested in securing work for their clients. "But most lobbyists that I have met are also interested in national defense too, and want to make sure that their company does a good job and competes with other companies," he said.