Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Building the Hybrid Cloud
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Future of Government Data Centers
- The Future of IT: How CIOs Can Enable the Service-Oriented Enterprise
- Government Perspectives on Mobility and the Cloud
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Mitigating Insider Threats in Virtual & Cloud Environments
- Modern Mission Critical Series
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- The New Generation of Database
- Reimagining the Next Generation of Government
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Targeting Advanced Threats: Proven Methods from Detection through Remediation
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- The Truth About IT Opex and Software Defined Networking
- Value of Health IT
- Air Traffic Management Transformation Report
- Cloud First Report
- General Dynamics IT Enterprise Center
- Gov Cloud Minute
- Government in Technology Series
- Homeland Security Cybersecurity Market Report
- National Cybersecurity Awareness Month
- Technology Insights
- The Cyber Security Report
- The Next Generation Cyber Security Experts
Shows & Panels
Key dates in EU antitrust action against Microsoft
Friday - 3/8/2013, 1:28am EST
AMSTERDAM (AP) -- The European Union has fined Microsoft Corp. EUR561 million ($733 million) for failing to live up to the terms of a settlement that was to end the company's 15-year run-in with the continent's competition regulators.
Here's a look at how a 1998 complaint by Sun Microsystems led to Microsoft receiving fines totaling EUR2.2 billion -- $2.9 billion at today's exchange rates.
The Sun complaint was that Microsoft wouldn't turn over technical documents needed to build interfaces between their products. Over the years, the EU broadened its investigation to include whether Microsoft had abused Window's near-monopoly over the market for computer operating systems to corner other markets, including server software, streaming media software, and Internet browsers.
Here's how the case developed:
-- March 24, 2004: The European Commission finds Microsoft guilty of breaking competition law and abusing its dominance in the operating system market. It fines the company EUR497 million. It also orders Microsoft to share technical documents with rivals and market a version of Windows without a media player.
-- June 15, 2005: After losing an appeal, Microsoft makes Windows XP N -- without Media Player -- available. There are few takers. The same month, EU also raises concerns about the usability of Microsoft's technical documents.
-- July 12, 2006: EU decides Microsoft isn't obeying the 2004 decision and penalizes it an additional EUR280.5 million.
-- March 1, 2007: EU threatens Microsoft with even more penalties, accusing the company of further noncompliance by setting royalty fees too high for technical documents.
-- Oct. 22: Microsoft agrees to slash fees for the technical documents. It also offers access to open source developers and others for a one-time fee of EUR10,000. Though this resolves key parts of the dispute, but the EU says Microsoft is still subject to penalties for its noncompliance until then.
-- Jan. 14, 2008: Following a complaint by Web browser developer Opera Software ASA, the EU announces it is investigating Microsoft again. This time, it's on suspicion of squeezing rival Internet browsers and software rivals dependent on Microsoft programs out of the market.
-- Feb. 27: EU regulators impose a EUR899 million penalty -- a record at the time -- for failing to fully comply with the 2004 antitrust order. This is on top of the fine imposed in 2004 and the penalty of 2006 and brings the total to nearly EUR1.7 billion.
-- May 9: Microsoft announces it has appealed the penalty.
-- Jan. 16, 2009: The European Commission orders Microsoft to untie its Internet Explorer browser from Windows.
-- July 24: Microsoft agrees to offer a choice of rival Web browsers on Windows to ward off new European Union antitrust fines.
-- Dec. 16: The European Union drops the browser case after Microsoft's offer to give Windows users in Europe a choice of up to 12 other Web browsers. This ends all of the EU's active cases against Microsoft, though the appeal of the 2008 fine remains pending.
-- June 27, 2012: The General Court of the European Union rejects Microsoft's appeal of the 2008 penalty, but reduces it to EUR860 million.
-- March 6, 2013: The EU fines Microsoft EUR561 million for failing to offer users a choice of browsers when they installed a version of Windows 7. The failure went on for 16 months and affected 15 million operating system installations. Microsoft acknowledged the failure and apologized.
Copyright 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.