Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Building the Hybrid Cloud
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Future of Government Data Centers
- The Future of IT: How CIOs Can Enable the Service-Oriented Enterprise
- Government Perspectives on Mobility and the Cloud
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Mitigating Insider Threats in Virtual & Cloud Environments
- Modern Mission Critical Series
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- The New Generation of Database
- Reimagining the Next Generation of Government
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Targeting Advanced Threats: Proven Methods from Detection through Remediation
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- The Truth About IT Opex and Software Defined Networking
- Value of Health IT
- Air Traffic Management Transformation Report
- Cloud First Report
- General Dynamics IT Enterprise Center
- Gov Cloud Minute
- Government in Technology Series
- Homeland Security Cybersecurity Market Report
- National Cybersecurity Awareness Month
- Technology Insights
- The Cyber Security Report
- The Next Generation Cyber Security Experts
Shows & Panels
Jury: White officers falsely arrested black teen
Monday - 3/31/2014, 7:52pm EDT
PITTSBURGH (AP) -- Three white officers accused in a federal civil rights lawsuit of beating a black performing arts high school student falsely arrested him but didn't use excessive force, a jury found Monday, awarding him $119,000 in damages.
The split verdict by the all-white jury of four men and four women had attorneys for 22-year-old Jordan Miles and the officers -- David Sisak, Michael Saldutte and Richard Ewing -- claiming victory, with neither side completely satisfied.
The jurors awarded Miles $101,016.75 in compensatory damages and $6,000 from each officer for punitive damages for acting "maliciously and wantonly."
Miles' attorney, Joel Sansone, said he was gratified but didn't understand how the jurors decided on the damages or concluded police were wrong to arrest Miles but not to beat him.
"The only thing he wanted to hear was that these officers did the wrong thing," Sansone said of Miles, "and he heard that in the courtroom today."
Robert Leight, the attorney for Ewing -- who has since left the city police force to work in the suburbs -- said the verdict "makes no sense."
Jurors leaving the courthouse declined to comment, leaving unclear how they viewed the conflicting accounts of what happened the night of Jan. 12, 2010.
Miles contends he was talking on his cellphone while walking to his grandmother's when the plainclothes officers rolled up in an unmarked car asking for money, drugs and a gun without identifying themselves. His lawyers argued that "jump out" tactic -- which police denied using -- is designed to catch suspected drug dealers off-guard.
The officers maintain they flashed their badges and yelled "Police!" and stopped Miles only because he appeared to be lurking near a neighbor's home. They claim Miles panicked and ran after being asked why he was "sneaking around" -- and the confrontation escalated when Miles elbowed Saldutte in the head, then kicked Sisak in the knee, before officers mistook a "bulge" in Miles' coat pocket for a gun.
The officers acknowledge kneeing and punching Miles to subdue him before determining the bulge was a bottle of Mountain Dew. Miles denies even carrying the bottle, which officers said they threw away because it wasn't evidence of the prowling, assault and resisting arrest charges they filed against Miles.
A city magistrate didn't find the police version credible and dismissed those charges weeks later. Sisak's attorney, James Wymard, believes that's why jury found the officers wrongly arrested Miles.
"Clearly this is a compromise verdict," Wymard said. "All along the excessive force is what we were worried about," and laughing, "Hah!" when told Miles said he didn't care about money he failed to win on that claim."
Miles' attorney wants the FBI and Justice Department to reconsider a decision not to prosecute the officers criminally. U.S. Attorney David Hickton didn't immediately comment.
But Leight said the verdict proves the Justice Department was right not to prosecute the officers -- especially because the burden of proof in a criminal case is even higher than in Miles' lawsuit.
Meanwhile, Wymard and Saldutte's attorney, Brian Campbell, said the monetary damages aren't a clear victory for Miles.
Miles' attorneys previously demanded $2 million to settle the case and rejected the city's offer of $180,000. The city, instead, paid $75,000 to settle Miles' claims against the government itself, with the understanding that money would be deducted from any damages award against the officers.
Because more than $41,000 of the verdict was covered by city insurance, the city's $75,000 could be deducted from the remaining $78,000 -- leaving Miles with a net award of $3,000, Wymard and Campbell said. And Miles could still wind up paying some of the officers' attorneys' fees because he didn't win the case outright.
Sansone said he was still researching those claims and couldn't immediately comment, but Wymard said, "Eventually, Miles may well be writing the City of Pittsburgh a check in this case."
Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.