Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Building the Hybrid Cloud
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Future of Government Data Centers
- The Future of IT: How CIOs Can Enable the Service-Oriented Enterprise
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- The New Generation of Database
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Targeting Advanced Threats: Proven Methods from Detection through Remediation
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- The Truth About IT Opex and Software Defined Networking
- Value of Health IT
- Air Traffic Management Transformation Report
- Cloud First Report
- General Dynamics IT Enterprise Center
- Gov Cloud Minute
- Government in Technology Series
- Homeland Security Cybersecurity Market Report
- National Cybersecurity Awareness Month
- Technology Insights
- The Cyber Security Report
- The Next Generation Cyber Security Experts
Shows & Panels
Aresco: Commissioners support adding marquee bowl
Friday - 10/26/2012, 5:56pm EDT
By RALPH D. RUSSO
AP College Football Writer
NEW YORK (AP) - Big East Commissioner Mike Aresco says support for adding a bowl game to college football's new postseason system has not waned.
Earlier this week, ESPN.com reported the chances of a seventh game being added to the playoff rotation that starts in 2014 had decreased because of various concerns, ranging from the value of the game's television rights to where it will be played.
The original playoff plan had the national semifinals rotating among six major bowl games. Last month, the conference commissioners discussed expanding to the pool to seven games to give better access to the Big East, Mountain West, Conference USA , Sun Belt and Mid-American Conference.
"None of us had heard anything about the game being in any jeopardy," Aresco said Friday in an interview with The Associated Press.
The proposed plan for a seventh game calls for the top-rated champion from the Big East and the other four conferences to play either a Pac-12 or a Big 12 team in years when that game is not hosting a semifinal.
Yet tepid interest in the game from possible television partners is a potential stumbling block. How much TV rights would be for such a game is uncertain. Speculation has been anywhere from $20 million per year to about $55 million.
"We're trying to put the game together," Aresco said. "We think there will be significant interest from TV entities, but it's premature. We haven't gone that far."
Aresco said the goal is to find a permanent home for the game. A site has not been determined but Aresco is confident a good one can be found.
Pac-12 Commissioner Larry Scott said during a radio interview Thursday on the "Tim Brando Show" that a decision on adding a seventh game could be six to nine months away.
Aresco spearheaded the push for a seventh game because the Big East stands to benefit most from its addition. The Big East has had an automatic bid to the Bowl Championship Series since it was implemented in 1998. Now that the BCS is going away and the conference is losing some major players, the rebuilt Big East is trying to regain its standing in college football's hierarchy.
What used to be considered the Big Six conferences in major college football _ the Big East, along with the Big Ten, Southeastern Conference, Pac-12, Big 12 and Atlantic Coast Conference _ is now often being referred to as the Big Five.
Aresco and the Big East have been aggressively battling that perception.
"We know we're a very strong conference and I don't want a narrative like that to take hold," he said. "Because it's just wrong."
He pointed out that one prominent sports website's most recent conference rankings placed the Big East fifth.
"And I won't mention who we are ahead of," he said.
It was the ACC, which has an agreement to send its champion or another highly rated team to the Orange Bowl in the new postseason system.
Both the Big East and ACC have two teams ranked in the latest AP Top 25, though future Big East member Boise State is also in the rankings. The Big East's record against nonconference opponents from the FBS is 14-10 this season. The ACC's is 13-14.
But the Big East is in transition, and it is unclear how its latest incarnation will play out.
Pitt and Syracuse are leaving for the ACC. Boise State and San Diego State will become football only members in the Big East next season. Memphis, Houston, Central Florida and SMU will join in all sports.
The new Big East will span all four time zones, and the quality of its football members could be at the very least on par with what it has been in recent years, before West Virginia left for ther Big 12.
Its long-term viability, however, is uncertain. The Big East has been negotiating with ESPN on a new TV deal, but if a deal is not struck by the end of the month, the conference will be free to negotiate with other networks.
"We've had several networks express interest in Big East product," Aresco said. "I can't speculate on what will happen in the next week or so."
The conference is hoping to land a long-term contract that will at least be in the ballpark of the multibillion dollar deals the other power conferences have signed in recent years. The ACC's new deal with the ESPN will allow the conference to pay its members about $17 million per year.