Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Building the Hybrid Cloud
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Future of Government Data Centers
- The Future of IT: How CIOs Can Enable the Service-Oriented Enterprise
- Government Perspectives on Mobility and the Cloud
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Mitigating Insider Threats in Virtual & Cloud Environments
- Modern Mission Critical Series
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- The New Generation of Database
- Reimagining the Next Generation of Government
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Targeting Advanced Threats: Proven Methods from Detection through Remediation
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- The Truth About IT Opex and Software Defined Networking
- Value of Health IT
- Air Traffic Management Transformation Report
- Cloud First Report
- General Dynamics IT Enterprise Center
- Gov Cloud Minute
- Government in Technology Series
- Homeland Security Cybersecurity Market Report
- National Cybersecurity Awareness Month
- Technology Insights
- The Cyber Security Report
- The Next Generation Cyber Security Experts
Shows & Panels
IT dashboard pushes CIOs back to the front and center
Wednesday - 7/1/2009, 6:30am EDT
By Jason Miller and Melinda Zosh
Soon after Vivek Kundra became the federal chief information officer in March, he met with Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) about federal technology spending.
Coburn, the co-author, along with then-Sen. Barack Obama, of the Federal Financial Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA), and Kundra discussed why federal technology projects fail and why the return on investment many times is much less than expected.
The Defense Department's Future Combat System and the Census Bureau's handheld devices are often cited examples of this systemic problem.
"There continues to be a number of IT failures, a lack of transparency and as we looked at the Management Watch List one of the most difficult things historically is looking at that list and figure out the health of IT investments and projects," Kundra says. "Unfortunately it didn't give a lot of visibility into what was going on and what was the root cause of some of these problems."
Additionally, agency CIOs were quietly being pushed out of the board room, and back to the server room.
"We've noticed the past couple of years was the role of the CIO was being moved further down into the organization," Kundra says. "The Census Bureau is a classic example where CIO was not involved in making some of those decisions. The White House is leading the way. The President has appointed a CIO and chief technology officer. It reflects the importance of technology to this administration."
To help solve these and other ongoing challenges, Kundra Tuesday unveiled the Office of Management and Budget's new way, called an IT dashboard, to track IT projects and hold agency CIOs-and others-more accountable for the program's performance.
"This requires a new foundation built on transparency, responsibility and accountability," Kundra says. "A new foundation that requires we lean forward and say 'look there are structure problems that have existed and there are issues for how we are managing IT projects,' and that has been the impetus for rolling out this dashboard, which is to make sure we have the ability to make available the data in terms of how we manage IT investments across the board to the public, and also tap into people across the country."
The public can access unfiltered data related to IT spending, and they can view the progress of IT investments. The dashboard also offers tools for the public to analyze spending, to ask questions to CIOs and to offer suggestions for improvement.
Kundra says "billions in technology", $76 billion to be exact, are being spent annually, and 300 million Americans can now see where their tax money is going, comment and offer "innovations" for how the government can do better.
"People don't know the problems we are trying to solve in the federal government," he says.
The dashboard is part of USAspending.gov and part of the effort to revamp the site.
Kundra says the dashboard also includes pictures of agency CIOs, which helps avoid "faceless accountability." The dashboard also illustrates an initiative's cost, timetable, delays to the projects and performance. It uses a red, yellow and green rating system to illustrate where the agency stands as well as how a specific project is doing.
OMB and the CIO Council are asking for direct feedback on the dashboard. Kundra says this tool uses the "power of online organizing" to let users import and manipulate data.
The site provides data that can be sorted and embedded in Web sites, such as Facebook, and through Excel spreadsheets and view RSS feeds.
Defense deputy CIO and CIO Council vice chairman Dave Wennergren says this "agile technology" is only the beginning of what's to come.
"Transparency sets you free," Wennergren says. "You have better dialogue on the interior and the exterior."
Kundra says that the beginning stages of the IT dashboard is "an important journey about how taxpayers' money is spent."
Even though the primary focus is on IT, the government plans to use the interactive IT dashboard as a launching pad to apply to other areas of government spending.
The reaction inside and out of government has been positive.
Sen. Joseph Lieberman (I-Conn.), chairman of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, says the dashboard "marks another leap forward for open government, public accountability, and management efficiency and serves as a model to open up more information on federal spending."
Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), ranking member of the same committee, calls the dashboard a critical piece to holding the government more accountable for results and progress.