Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Building the Hybrid Cloud
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Future of Government Data Centers
- The Future of IT: How CIOs Can Enable the Service-Oriented Enterprise
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Mitigating Insider Threats in Virtual & Cloud Environments
- Modern Mission Critical Series
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- The New Generation of Database
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Targeting Advanced Threats: Proven Methods from Detection through Remediation
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- The Truth About IT Opex and Software Defined Networking
- Value of Health IT
- Air Traffic Management Transformation Report
- Cloud First Report
- General Dynamics IT Enterprise Center
- Gov Cloud Minute
- Government in Technology Series
- Homeland Security Cybersecurity Market Report
- National Cybersecurity Awareness Month
- Technology Insights
- The Cyber Security Report
- The Next Generation Cyber Security Experts
Shows & Panels
GAO: State could get more bang out of training buck
Thursday - 3/10/2011, 4:14pm EST
In fiscal year 2010, the department spent $255 million on training alone, according to the Government Accountability Office evaluation of State's training programs.
State's spending on training will only increase as the department gets set to take a bigger role in Iraq and Afghanistan, said Jess Ford, director of International Affairs and Trade Issues at the GAO, in an interview with the DorobekINSIDER.
But constrained budgets are forcing State to zero in on high priority training areas, something the department cannot do now because it does not have a comprehensive process for assessing training, Ford said.
"At the end of the day, we don't want to be sending people - particularly overseas in hostile environments - into a situation where they don't have the basic, fundamental skill sets," he said.
Ford described the current training as "ad hoc." For example, the Foreign Service has a training plan but the civil service does not, he said.
State's Foreign Service Institute is the main training provider for the department's more than 66,000 Foreign Service, civil service and locally employed staff worldwide.
The institute provides more than 700 courses in the Washington area alone and more than 2,000 internationally, including foreign language and technical training, Ford said. GAO did not have any criticism of how FSI addressed training, he said.
One area that could expand throughout State is use of distance learning, an option that makes sense for a workforce spread out over 250 foreign posts. State "may be able to get more bang for the buck using distance learning over classroom training," Ford said.