Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Building the Hybrid Cloud
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- The New Generation of Database
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Targeting Advanced Threats: Proven Methods from Detection through Remediation
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- Value of Health IT
Shows & Panels
Scott Bloch fights to avoid prison time
Thursday - 2/24/2011, 9:41am EST
Senior Internet Editor
According to the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, when you plead guilty to a crime, "if there is a mandatory minimum sentence that you be advised of it," says Debra Roth, a partner with Shaw, Bransford and Roth.
Normally, this isn't much of an issue, but when former head of the Office of Special Counsel, Scott Bloch, pled guilty to a misdemeanor charge of criminal contempt of Congress, it seems no one involved in the case really knew there would be a mandatory 30 day prison sentence.
Now, Roth explained to Federal News Radio, Bloch has asked the court to be allowed to withdraw his guilty plea and start the case all over again.
Bloch, his attorneys, and the government, said Roth, "took the position back in April when he pled guilty that there was no mandatory minimum." At the core of it, said Roth, "that's why he pled guilty to it: because he thought he would do probation and not go to jail."
Now, in asking for the court to withdraw his plea, said Roth, "obviously Mr. Bloch does not want to spend any time in jail," and will have to find another deal to plead to or go to trial.
Of course spending 30 days in a federal prison is no joy ride, but a more lasting reason to change his plea and consider fighting the case at trial is the possibility of losing his license to practice law.
Because the U.S. Attorney in the case has already stated they don't oppose the withdrawl of Bloch's plea, Roth said it's "probably a foregone conclusion. To me the more interesting next step is what's going to happen next. Are they really going to trial...or are they going to try to find another offense to plead to."