Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Building the Hybrid Cloud
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- The New Generation of Database
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Targeting Advanced Threats: Proven Methods from Detection through Remediation
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- The Truth About IT Opex and Software Defined Networking
- Value of Health IT
Shows & Panels
Self-plus-one health insurance: How come?
Wednesday - 5/29/2013, 2:00am EDT
On the other hand, why should a couple whose children are grown and gone still have to pay the same premiums as people producing and protecting a large brood?
Why should older people who have survived all that life have to pay the same premiums as higher-risk younger people for whom Jackass: The Movie is their blueprint for life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness? While they tend to cost more in most cases, many seniors say that the lifestyle choices of younger people put them at greater risk.
Why indeed? It's the risk pool, stupid! That's what we've been told.
For decades, the standard answer has been that the Federal Employee Health Benefits Plan is a group plan. As in G-R-O-U-P. Everybody in the pool. The same pool. The options are self-only, or self-plus-family.
Older couples past their child-bearing years paid the same premium as couples with lots of kids if they were in the same plans. Younger, generally, healthier workers helped subsidize couples having kids — with their attendant bills — and people over 65 whose health costs are generally higher. One caveat: FEHBP retirees with Medicare are often the cheapest to insure because Medicare (also a federal entitlement program) pays first.
So, GROUP plan. Group rates.
For decades, the Office of Personnel Management, the agency that runs the massive FEHBP program, resisted the self-plus-one concept. Now OPM is trying to persuade Congress to implement it. Perhaps offer it as early as this November when the FEHBP and Benefits Open Season begins, should Congress act. That's the period when you pick your health plan (and some other optional benefits) for the 2014 year.
So how is self-plus-one going to work? And what's OPM doing to implement a law, passed last year, that allows selected workers to take phased retiremen? The idea is that they would work several days a week, spending part of their time mentoring younger employees and those who will take their place. It is a dream-not-yet-come-true for many feds.
So, how's it going: Today at 10 a.m. our Your Turn radio show, guests are Jessica Klement, legislative director of the National Active and Retired Federal Employees, and Stephen Losey, senior writer for the Federal Times. They are going to cover the legislative waterfront, starting with the self-plus-one health plan option. We'll also be checking out everything from phased retirement to what many consider the biggest threat to federal workers — the chained CPI.
NEARLY USELESS FACTOID
Compiled by Jack Moore
In the midst of World War II, the head of the War Foods Administration banned the sale of pre-sliced bread, citing the need to conserve resources. Others conjecture it was to lower bread and flour prices. The order was rescinded after just three months.
(Source: Today I Found Out)
MORE FROM FEDERAL NEWS RADIO
retirement wave: What's behind the flubbed predictions?
The federal retirement tsunami — a massive exodus of thousands of Uncle Sam's most experienced employees — has been predicted for the past dozen years.
Headlines inside the Beltway frequently trumpeted the crisis, with one expert warning of a "human-capital time bomb" ticking away at agencies across the government.
Unions says HUD
reorganization plan violates furlough agreement
The union representing employees of the Department of Housing and Urban Development says the agency's reorganization plans violate an agreement it made concerning employee furloughs.
HUD plans to close dozens of field offices. Ten percent of staff or about 900 people could be affected.
U.S. Park Police cancels furloughs
Furloughs for employees of the U.S. Park Police will end June 1, the head of the National Park Service announced Friday. The Park Police have already taken three furlough days since sequestration went into effect in March.