Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Connected Government
- Consolidating Mission-critical Systems
- Constituent Servicing
- The Data Privacy Imperative: Safeguarding Sensitive Data
- Eliminating the Pitfalls: Steps to Virtualization in Government
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- Government Cloud Brokerage: Who, What, When, Where, Why?
- Government Mobility
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Mobile Device Management
- The Modern Federal Threat Landscape
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- Understanding the Intersection of Customer Service and Security in the Cloud
Shows & Panels
How effective are e-government projects?
Thursday - 9/29/2011, 10:00am EDT
Some federal agencies are wasting the money they spend on e-government.
The Government Accountability Office reviewed the $34 million spent by the Office of Management and Budget and the General Services Administration and the 16 projects — everything from federal cloud computing efforts to data center consolidation.
Valerie Melvin, GAO's director of information management and human capital issues, joined the Federal Drive with Tom Temin and Amy Morris to discuss the watchdog agency's latest report.
In particular, GAO turned its gaze on four key projects — FedRAMP, Citizen Services Dashboard, FedSpace and Data.gov — and found varying progress.
At the time of the review cloud security initiatives were still being developed; the Citizen Services Dashboard, measuring progress on federal customer-service metrics, was in a pilot stage; FedSpace, which provides Web-based networking and collaboration, was in "limited deployment"; while Data.gov, a federal spending database, had been "fully launched," GAO said.
However, other projects lacked "fully defined metrics," limiting the ability of managers to assess whether they are actually useful, "particularly important in a resource-constrained environment," when managers are counting every penny spent.