Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Building the Hybrid Cloud
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Future of Government Data Centers
- The Future of IT: How CIOs Can Enable the Service-Oriented Enterprise
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Mitigating Insider Threats in Virtual & Cloud Environments
- Modern Mission Critical Series
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- The New Generation of Database
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Targeting Advanced Threats: Proven Methods from Detection through Remediation
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- The Truth About IT Opex and Software Defined Networking
- Value of Health IT
- Air Traffic Management Transformation Report
- Cloud First Report
- General Dynamics IT Enterprise Center
- Gov Cloud Minute
- Government in Technology Series
- Homeland Security Cybersecurity Market Report
- National Cybersecurity Awareness Month
- Technology Insights
- The Cyber Security Report
- The Next Generation Cyber Security Experts
Shows & Panels
Should vendors be held liable for counterfeit IT products?
Tuesday - 11/18/2008, 12:48pm EST
In an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking in today's Federal Register, the council says it will hold a public meeting Dec. 11 at NASA headquarters in Washington to discuss this issue.
"While it is estimated that our nation's industries and government lose millions of dollars each year to counterfeiters, the trade in counterfeit IT products also presents serious threats to our national security and consumer safety," the council wrote in the Federal Register notice. "The council believes requiring contractors to represent that the IT products they sell to the government are authentic, will aid in efforts to combat counterfeit IT products."
The council also wants to know if these potential counterfeit liability requirements should be extended to other items agencies purchase, and whether the proposal should include technology components of a system or an assembled product.
As the proposed rule stands now, contractors would have to be the original manufacturer of the hardware or software, or have written authorization from the original manufacturer to be an authorized reseller or distributor. The proposal also does not limit the contractor's liability if they sell a counterfeit product.
For more information: Federal Register - Advanced notice of proposed rulemaking on authentic IT products