Shows & Panels
Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- American Readiness: Renewable Power and Efficiency Technologies
- Ask the CIO
- Building the Hybrid Cloud
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal News Radio's National Cyber Security Awareness Month Special Panel Discussion
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Future of Government Data Centers
- The Future of IT: How CIOs Can Enable the Service-Oriented Enterprise
- Government Perspectives on Mobility and the Cloud
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Mitigating Insider Threats in Virtual & Cloud Environments
- Modern Mission Critical Series
- The New Generation of Database
- Reimagining the Next Generation of Government
- Targeting Advanced Threats: Proven Methods from Detection through Remediation
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- The Truth About IT Opex and Software Defined Networking
- Air Traffic Management Transformation Report
- Cloud First Report
- General Dynamics IT Enterprise Center
- Gov Cloud Minute
- Government in Technology Series
- Homeland Security Cybersecurity Market Report
- National Cybersecurity Awareness Month
- Technology Insights
- The Cyber Security Report
- The Next Generation Cyber Security Experts
Shows & Panels
Fusion Centers facing growing pains
Friday - 2/25/2011, 7:44am EST
By Meg Beasley
Federal News Radio
The federal government is not adapting fast enough to the ever-changing threats to homeland security.
From cyber threats to homegrown terrorism, the challenges law enforcement face today are vastly different from those of the past.
Bart Johnson, principle deputy undersecretary of the Office of Intelligence and Analysis at the Department of Homeland Security, said the recent rise in domestic terrorism isn't an anomaly - it's the new norm - and security agencies need to operate accordingly. He said federal agencies can't handle the spike in homegrown terrorism alone; that they must partner with state, local and tribal law enforcement groups.
In order to facilitate collaboration, the 2007 National Strategy for Information Sharing called for the establishment of fusion centers. The centers serve as focal points for collecting, analyzing and sharing threat related information between federal and state, local and tribal partners.
"This is the new plan A," said Johnson during a speech Thursday at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington. "There is no plan B and there shouldn't be a plan B. This national network of fusion centers needs to be enhanced, it needs to continue to provide the value-added, and it certainly needs to be institutionalized."
He said that while the fusion centers are taking hold - there are 72 across the country - there is much progress to be made.
Fusion center directors outlined four critical operational capabilities (COPs) at their national conference last year. As a baseline, all fusion centers should be able to receive, analyze, disseminate and gather threat information. Officials conducted a baseline review of the centers in September.
Kerry Sleeper, a senior advisor in the Office of the Program Manager, (
"The fusion centers must continue to demonstrate relevancy to their customers - those people receiving information from the fusion centers - whether that's private sector, local law enforcement or state law enforcement," Sleeper said. "They must reflect the mission prioritization of their owners. These fusion centers are owned by state and local entities."
In many ways, the premise of fusion centers is the slogan, "if you see something, say something." They are meant to guide members of a community about potential threats - whether it is a terror plot or a new drug fad - as well as give them a place to report suspicious activities they witness.
Johnson said putting together many little, seemingly unimportant pieces of intelligence is the best way to uncover many threats.
The official review also showed the centers are struggling with fiscal constraints and want enhanced federal funding. Sleeper said it is difficult to build an organization on uncertain, annually approved grants. Most fusion centers receive funding from local governments and DHS. Some that work closely with the FBI share costs with that agency.
The degree to which the fusion centers actually foster collaboration with federal intelligence agencies like the FBI is unclear.
Elaine Cummings, chief information sharing officer at the FBI, said her agency knows collaboration between federal agencies and state, local and tribal authorities often makes the nation safer. But she added that the situation isn't always that simple.
"Fusion centers offer value to the FBI but they also have their own set of priorities that don't always match with the FBI," Cummings said. "Where the fusion centers focus on terrorism, their mission is also our mission. As they expand to all crimes there becomes less and less unity. There are overlaps - at the same time we have to recognize there are differences and that can make it very complicated."
Cummings said much of the focus on the federal side is developing high-level strategies and standardized approaches to guide collaboration with fusion centers nationwide.
Matthew Drake, FBI supervisory special agent and deputy director of the Northern Virginia Regional Intelligence Center, said state, local and tribal authorities are focused largely on the nuts-and-bolts of implementing the COPs.
He said budget constraints, technological issues and a shortage of well trained personnel are challenges at his center. But as a former federal agent now working at the state and local level, Drake said the biggest struggle he sees is between cultures.
"The relationships and the trust issue, that's what it all comes down to," Drake said. "We have different experiences we bring to the table, different priorities - that's never going to change. The FBI, DHS, we're never going to align our priorities with the state and county police department, we can't. We have different missions ultimately, and different ways of going about it. But we have to find ways to make that work."