Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Building the Hybrid Cloud
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Future of Government Data Centers
- The Future of IT: How CIOs Can Enable the Service-Oriented Enterprise
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- The New Generation of Database
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Targeting Advanced Threats: Proven Methods from Detection through Remediation
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- The Truth About IT Opex and Software Defined Networking
- Value of Health IT
- Air Traffic Management Transformation Report
- Cloud First Report
- General Dynamics IT Enterprise Center
- Gov Cloud Minute
- Government in Technology Series
- Homeland Security Cybersecurity Market Report
- National Cybersecurity Awareness Month
- Technology Insights
- The Cyber Security Report
- The Next Generation Cyber Security Experts
Shows & Panels
DoJ criticized over proposed FOIA regulation
Thursday - 10/27/2011, 4:45pm EDT
WASHINGTON (AP) - The Justice Department is being criticized by open government groups for proposing a regulation that would in rare instances allow federal law enforcement agencies to tell people seeking information under the Freedom of Information Act that the government has no records on a subject, when it actually does.
Avoiding tipping off people that they are under criminal investigation is one of three highly sensitive law enforcement situations where the government — for the past 2 1/2 decades — has been permitted to respond to FOIA requests by falsely denying that it has records.
The other two situations — the legal term for them is "exclusions" — occur when federal law enforcement agencies are protecting the identities of informants and when the FBI is asked for records on foreign intelligence or counterintelligence or international terrorism.
The issue is coming up now because the Justice Department is proposing revised regulations that would codify a longstanding policy detailed in a 1987 memo by then-Attorney General Edwin Meese.
The American Civil Liberties Union, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington and OpentheGovernment.org say the proposed rule "will dramatically undermine government integrity by allowing a law designed to provide public access to government information to be twisted to permit federal law enforcement agencies to actively lie to the American people."
Melanie Ann Pustay, director of the Justice Department's Office of Information Policy, says the provision "has been implemented the same way for the 25 years it has been in existence." She said the department took the "extraordinary step" of reopening the public comment period on the proposed revision of FOIA regulations and that the department has been open and transparent about the procedure for invoking exclusions protecting "especially sensitive law enforcement matters."
The problem is a simple one, according to Meese's 16,428-word memo and the Justice Department's proposed regulation.
Any person who suspects that a federal investigation might have been launched against him could try to use the FOIA to confirm that suspicion. Notifying the requester that the law enforcement agency is refusing to turn over records would confirm the existence of an ongoing investigation.
Meese's 1987 memo perhaps puts it best: a person filing a FOIA request seeking information about informants "will receive a disarming `no records' response."
A 1986 amendment by Congress to the FOIA cleared the legal path for the attorney general's memo. The proposed regulation is one piece in an overhaul of government rules on FOIA.
(Copyright 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)