Shows & Panels
Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- American Readiness: Renewable Power and Efficiency Technologies
- Ask the CIO
- Building the Hybrid Cloud
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal News Radio's National Cyber Security Awareness Month Special Panel Discussion
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Future of Government Data Centers
- The Future of IT: How CIOs Can Enable the Service-Oriented Enterprise
- Government Perspectives on Mobility and the Cloud
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Mitigating Insider Threats in Virtual & Cloud Environments
- Modern Mission Critical Series
- The New Generation of Database
- Reimagining the Next Generation of Government
- Targeting Advanced Threats: Proven Methods from Detection through Remediation
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- The Truth About IT Opex and Software Defined Networking
- Air Traffic Management Transformation Report
- Cloud First Report
- General Dynamics IT Enterprise Center
- Gov Cloud Minute
- Government in Technology Series
- Homeland Security Cybersecurity Market Report
- National Cybersecurity Awareness Month
- Technology Insights
- The Cyber Security Report
- The Next Generation Cyber Security Experts
Shows & Panels
White House: No wrongdoing in prostitution scandal
Friday - 9/21/2012, 6:00pm EDT
By BEN FELLER and ALICIA A. CALDWELL
WASHINGTON (AP) - Investigating the prostitution scandal at the Secret Service, the Homeland Security Department's inspector general uncovered a hotel record suggesting a member of President Barack Obama's team might have been involved, according to a summary of the case submitted to Congress. A senior administration official told The Associated Press the White House determined the record was false and that the person in question did nothing wrong.
The mere possibility of such an encounter raises the potential for election-year fallout for the White House, which reviewed the matter months ago and cleared all its workers of wrongdoing. In a sign of campaign politics, Republican lawmakers questioned the credibility of the White House review, as Obama's team feared.
"I am troubled that the (inspector general's) findings reveal White House personnel may have been involved," Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, said in a statement. "The White House explicitly denied any involvement after its own investigation and now the IG is questioning that account. This raises concerns about the credibility of the White House investigation."
Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, sent the White House a letter Thursday asking for more information about its internal review of the incident. Grassley also questioned whether the White House had any role in delaying the inspector general's report, which had been expected to be completed months ago.
The acting inspector general, Charles K. Edwards, said the employee_ described by the administration as a volunteer, not a staff member _ "may have had contact with foreign nationals" and "may have been affiliated with the White House advance operation," according to a letter to lawmakers obtained by the AP. Edwards cited as evidence a hotel registry obtained by his investigators.
Edwards acknowledged that his investigators did not pursue information about the activities of the White House worker, who was not identified, or the actions of another U.S. military employee, because his report was intended to focus solely on employees at the Homeland Security Department. Edwards said his office "did not conduct any additional investigation into this finding and has made no determination related to these individuals because they are not DHS personnel."
Edwards also said that while the Secret Service employees "engaged in misconduct" Obama's security was never at risk.
The senior administration official told the AP that the hotel record Edwards cited in his letter to Congress was incorrect, and the person affiliated with the White House team did nothing improper. The official spoke on condition of anonymity to disclose details of a review that has not made been public and also spoke to quickly quash a potential controversy.
The Obama team member in question was a volunteer working as part of White House advance team that helped set up Obama's trip to Cartagena, Colombia, for a Latin America summit in April. The worker had his expenses paid but is not on the White House staff.
The official who spoke to the AP refused to name the White House advance team member.
The White House review found that a guest, perhaps a prostitute, had signed in to visit the same room assigned to that volunteer member of Obama's team. This occurred at the Hilton hotel where Obama would later stay during his visit.
But the review found that hotel log was false and that there was no other evidence to corroborate that the individual had received a visitor, the official said.
"As we've said for months, the White House review concluded that no members of the White House advance team, either staff or volunteers, engaged in inappropriate conduct during the president's trip to Colombia," said White House spokesman Eric Schultz on Friday.
One other member of the Secret Service had been inaccurately implicated when a guest who signed into the hotel falsely gave the Secret Service member's room number.
The prostitution scandal engulfed both Secret Service and military personnel.
According to the summary from Edwards, 13 Secret Service employees had "personal encounters with female Colombian nationals" while they were in Cartagena in advance of Obama's arrival for a South American summit.
"These encounters took place at the Hotel Caribe, the Hilton Cartagena and at a private residence," Edwards wrote. All but one of the employees was interviewed.
Six of the women, including a prostitute who has identified herself as Dania Suarez, were paid, according to the case summary. Five women asked for payment but didn't receive any cash and three other women didn't ask for payment.