Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Building the Hybrid Cloud
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- The New Generation of Database
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Targeting Advanced Threats: Proven Methods from Detection through Remediation
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- The Truth About IT Opex and Software Defined Networking
- Value of Health IT
Shows & Panels
Lawmakers worried DHS losing faith in Federal Protective Service
Wednesday - 5/21/2014, 4:40pm EDT
The agency tasked with securing federal buildings across the country has been booted by the Homeland Security Department from overseeing security at its Washington, D.C., headquarters.
The Federal Protective Service will no longer coordinate security at DHS headquarters on Nebraska Avenue in Northwest D.C. according to a May 1 memo from the agency's chief security officer to the undersecretary for management. The memo was brought to light Wednesday by members of a House Transportation and Infrastructure subcommittee at a hearing on the security of federal buildings.
Since 2003, FPS — an agency within DHS — has been tasked with safeguarding some 9,600 federally owned and leased facilities nationwide. The agency is staffed by about 1,000 federal law-enforcement officials and more than 13,000 private security guards.
But the agency has long been plagued by concerns over lax oversight and uneven performance.
Rep. Lou Barletta (R-Pa.), chairman of the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings and Emergency Management, cited the DHS memo as a possible sign that "confidence in FPS may be eroding" from within DHS.
FPS Director L. Eric Patterson, who has led the agency since 2010, disputed that assessment.
"To my knowledge, this was not an issue of performance, and I do not believe that the department has lost confidence in the Federal Protective Service," he testified. "I believe this was an issue of efficiency and unity of command."
Private security guards employed by FPS will continue to provide security at DHS headquarters, he said, although FPS will no longer be responsible for the day-to-day management of them.
Still, contractor guards and FPS will remain "a robust presence at the facility as we always have," Patterson said. "So, this is really about the contract management, not about losing confidence in our ability to provide security and law-enforcement support."
Members of committee, however, seized on the news to point to the persistent management challenges the agency has faced in securing federal facilities.
Are contract guards properly trained?
The Government Accountability Office has documented serious, persistent deficiencies in the agency's handling of building security over the past several years.
For example, it's unclear how effectively the agency's largely contractor workforce has been trained, because the agency doesn't do a very good job keeping track, Mark Goldstein, GAO's director of physical infrastructure, testified.
For example, late last year, GAO reported that at least five contractor companies said their guards had not received training for how to respond to active-shooter situations.
Another company told GAO more than a third of its workforce had never received training on how to conduct security screenings, including how to properly use X-ray equipment and metal detectors, he added.
"We do have concerns that remain and that have remained for a number of years now about the possibility of bombs and other kinds of weapons getting into federal facilities because there is an assurance that the person standing guard and responsible for putting things through a magnetometer and an X-ray machine has the adequate training to prevent something from coming through that shouldn't," he testified.
At this point, it's almost impossible to know how many contractor guards — called private security officers, by FPS — have undergone training in certain areas, because the agency lacks a reliable system for tracking and maintaining that information.
Several years ago when GAO examined the issue, it found about 1,500 contract guards that lacked adequate training. That number has likely gone down, Goldstein said, but in talking with contractor companies across the country, "pockets" of untrained guards remain.
Patterson, the FPS director, said the agency is "working aggressively" with the National Association of Security Companies — a private trade association — to develop a nationwide training curriculum, including guidance for responding to active-shooter situations.
GAO says building reviews lacking
Along with its day-to-day duties securing federal facilities, FPS is also tasked with conducting risk-assessments of federally owned and leased buildings and recommending the measures that should be taken to secure them.
The problem, according to GAO, is that FPS currently lacks the ability to do so "in a manner consistent with federal standards," Goldstein said. Meanwhile, a backlog of uncompleted security reviews continue to pile up.
Since the agency pulled the plug on its massive, multimillion-dollar Risk Assessment and Management Program in 2012, FPS has been relying on an interim tool it calls the Modified Infrastructure Survey Tool, or MIST, to review building security.