Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Connected Government
- Consolidating Mission-critical Systems
- Constituent Servicing
- Continuous Monitoring: Tools and Techniques for Trustworthy Government IT
- The Data Privacy Imperative: Safeguarding Sensitive Data
- Eliminating the Pitfalls: Steps to Virtualization in Government
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- Government Cloud Brokerage: Who, What, When, Where, Why?
- Government Mobility
- Mission-critical Apps in the Cloud
- Mobile Device Management
- The Modern Federal Threat Landscape
- The Path from Legacy Systems
- Understanding the Intersection of Customer Service and Security in the Cloud
Shows & Panels
Homeland Security: Inside & Out - February 15th, 2009
Friday - 2/13/2009, 1:36pm EST
In Part I, they discuss:
- How homeland security emerged as a line of thought at the federal level prior to the 9/11 attacks.
- The debate over whether to focus the nation's resources on high probability/low consequence events (such as car bombs) or low probability/high consequence events (such as nuclear or biological attacks).
- Their initial reactions to the 9/11 terrorist attacks and the subsequent anthrax attacks, and their analysis of the investigations that followed.
In Part II, they discuss:
- The rush after 9/11 to create the Department of Homeland Security, and its long-term implications for the nation.
- The effects of the Bush administration's decision to largely ignore the findings of the Hart-Rudman Commission, a bi-partisan panel that studied homeland security issues for three years.
- Whether the model for counterterrorism should be viewed as law-enforcement, war ... or something else.
In Part III, they discuss:
- Whether Congress should pull FEMA out of DHS.
- Who should get the blame for what happened -- and didn't happen -- during Hurricane Katrina.
- The need to stop trying to handle emergency management at the federal, state and local levels "on the cheap."