Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Building the Hybrid Cloud
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Future of Government Data Centers
- The Future of IT: How CIOs Can Enable the Service-Oriented Enterprise
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- The New Generation of Database
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Targeting Advanced Threats: Proven Methods from Detection through Remediation
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- The Truth About IT Opex and Software Defined Networking
- Value of Health IT
- Air Traffic Management Transformation Report
- Cloud First Report
- General Dynamics IT Enterprise Center
- Gov Cloud Minute
- Government in Technology Series
- Homeland Security Cybersecurity Market Report
- National Cybersecurity Awareness Month
- Technology Insights
- The Cyber Security Report
- The Next Generation Cyber Security Experts
Shows & Panels
Federal HR reforms demand an inside/out strategy
Thursday - 5/22/2014, 4:12am EDT
Federal chief human capital officers no longer say working within the current federal HR system is the answer to improving the hiring, firing and other processes.
Instead, CHCOs say it's time to make wholesale changes to the increasingly complex human resources processes.
This belief comes from the recent Partnership for Public Service and Grant Thornton survey where 62 CHCOs and other federal HR leaders say Congress needs to "revamp the federal government's pay and job classification system. These antiquated and ineffective systems hinder the government's ability to attract, retain and deploy employees as effectively and efficiently as possible."
Michael Kerr, the assistant secretary for administration and management at the Labor Department, said the systemic problems with federal HR processes are a central theme throughout the report.
"It said the personnel system needs to change. If you read the report throughout it, people are quoted as saying that. And then there are recommendations and thoughts that this needs to be addressed and changed," he said during a panel discussion Wednesday in Washington sponsored by the Partnership and Grant Thornton. "That's actually a big difference in my experience talking to HR directors, and I read the report twice to see if I found this other argument. I've confronted the argument over and over again. That 'You know if people only learned what the rules were, they could do the recruiting they wanted to do, they could do hiring they wanted to do and they could figure out how to fire people.' That phrase, that argument doesn't appear in this report at all. I think it's really important that the human resources community is getting away from, 'this thing works for everybody if they'd only figure out the rules the way I know them.' I was delighted that argument didn't appear in this report and throughout this report they said the system needed to change."
Merit principles violations?
Experts say the changes have to happen across the board because it's not just one part that doesn't work.
But there are areas that need attention more quickly. For example, the CHCOs say despite efforts by the Office of Personnel Management, agencies continue to struggle with the hiring process. In the report, CHCOs say they face higher than average turnover, rising workloads and tight budgets, and can't always make sure that the people agencies hire are exceptionally well matched to jobs.
Kerr said the problems with the hiring system are only getting worse.
"We have a system that almost violates the first merit principle: that we have open competition for everybody for all jobs. I think we are getting very close to a closed system," he said. "Most of our hiring is people who are already in the federal workforce. USAJobs is very difficult to navigate if you are an outsider. We have a language in the HR world that only people in the federal service understand and can work their way through. I have no assurance that when I go out and recruit that people who I ask to apply for jobs will actually get through the process of USAJobs without giving up. I really appreciated the line in this report that the system we have now is a disincentive to recruit. It is very hard for me to recruit people from outside government from the work that gets placed."
Now not everyone on the panel was so pessimistic.
Brad Bunn, the director of human resources for the Defense Logistics Agency, said the workforce has its share of challenges, but it understands what it faces and is meeting its mission.
Patricia Adams, the deputy assistant secretary of the Navy for civilian human resources, said she too is optimistic because of the technology and data analytics that is helping improve the federal HR system.
But the panelists also agreed that updating policy, regulations and laws is a must do.
Bunn said the fix has to start by simplifying the processes. He said there are four rules for federal HR, but 40,000 exceptions.
Adams added that on top of that there are 500 hiring authorities.
Bunn and Adams both agreed that no one knows all the rules and regulations that govern federal HR processes.
"We don't have one personnel system in the Department of Defense or in the federal government. We have a patchwork of lots of different systems that are part of the 40,000 exceptions that I talked about," Bunn said. "We have demonstration projects that have been demonstrated for 30 years now. We have pilots that probably either should have gone away or been adopted as the system years and years ago. Even in the classification and pay system we have a patchwork of different rules."