Shows & Panels
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- The Big Data Dilemma
- Carrying On with Continuity of Operations
- Connected Government
- Constituent Servicing
- Continuous Monitoring: Tools and Techniques for Trustworthy Government IT
- The Cyber Imperative
- Cyber Solutions for 2013 and Beyond
- Expert Voices
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal IT Challenge
- Federal Tech Talk
- Mission-critical Apps in the Cloud
- The Path from Legacy Systems
- The Real Deal on Digital Government
- The Reality of Continuous Monitoring... Is Your Agency Secure?
- Veterans in Private Sector: Making the Transition
Shows & Panels
Analysis: GSA scandal increases scrutiny on agency spending
Tuesday - 4/17/2012, 9:47am EDT
"It isn't just conference spending. It's a lot of areas federal executives and managers and political appointees should be paying close attention to how much they're spending and whether their mission can be accomplished in a more effective way," Bransford said in an interview with The Federal Drive with Tom Temin and Emily Kopp.
One question the GSA story highlights is how many other people knew about the excessive spending and didn't come forward with the information. Also, is the failure to come forward considered misconduct?
"The reality is, no one likes a whistleblower, and someone who does blow the whistle usually ends up on the wrong side of agency management," Bransford said. "There's a natural pressure to remain silent."
But the GSA scandal might make it easier to report wrongdoing.
"I think employees are going to be expected to step forward and raise these kinds of issues when they see things causing difficulties," he said.